ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019
The importance of drying and grinding samples for determining mobile chromium fractions in polluted river sediments.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of river sediments after flocculation-pressure filter membrane-vacuum preloading.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A possible impact of sample preparation on the chemical fractionation results is generally underestimated in studies of forms of occurrence of heavy metals in river sediments. Our analysis of the recently published results of sequential extraction of chromium has revealed the effect of sample grinding on the result of determination of mobile chromium fractions in river sediments. This observation has been experimentally verified along with the analysation of potential effect of river sediment drying conditions on chromium distribution pattern. The studies were carried out on river sediments polluted with tannery effluents (Cr, 29.2-233 mg/kg). The determined content of chromium bound to carbonates in powdered samples was 2 to 7 times higher than those in raw river sediment samples. It was shown that the main reason was the different kinetic characteristics of chromium leaching in these sediments. Using the shrinking core model, it was found that diffusion through the "ash layer" was the rate-controlling step during the extraction of the carbonate fraction of chromium. It has been additionally confirmed that common air drying of sediment samples does not affect the results of chemical fractionation of chromium.The results of our studies are also vital for the assessment of environmental risk posed by river sediments polluted with heavy metals. In the case of sediment samples used in this study, powdering changed the risk category (RAC) from low risk to high risk. Hence, in order to achieve a realistic assessment of chromium mobility and environmental risk, it is advisable to use raw samples, despite their poorer homogeneity, and thus, lower precision of chemical fractionation results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.