Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31432246›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2019

[Cannabis medicines in pain management : Interim analysis of the survey accompanying the prescription of cannabis-based medicines in Germany with regard to pain as primarily treated symptom].

P Cremer-Schaeffer, G Schmidt-Wolf, K Broich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P Cremer-SchaefferBundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland. peter.cremer-schaeffer@bfarm.de.
G Schmidt-WolfBundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland.
K BroichBundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Germany, physicians who prescribe cannabis-based medicines at the expense of the statutory health insurance are obliged to take part in an accompanying survey. Pain was the most commonly reported diagnosis, making an interim evaluation for the indication of pain feasible.

methodsPatient-related data was transmitted to the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices via an online portal. In addition to demographic data, information on the treated disease or symptoms, the course of therapy, adverse reactions and treatment success were evaluated.

resultsA total of 3138 data sets were evaluated for the main diagnosis of pain. Dronabinol was the most frequently (64%) prescribed cannabis-based drug. On average, patients were 57 years old and women and men were equally represented. Patients treated with cannabis flowers were significantly younger (48 years). The proportion of men in this group was 68% and 83% in the group of 18- to 40-year-olds. According to the assessment by treating physicians, pain was significantly improved in 35.5% of the patients. The most frequent side effects (fatigue, dizziness, nausea) corresponded to those already known from the product information of the cannabis-based medicinal products authorized under the pharmaceutical law. Treatment was discontinued in 1179 patients within 1 year.

conclusionPhysicians should comply with their legal obligation to participate in the accompanying survey. Pain is by far the most common diagnosis in cannabis drugs. For about one third of these patients, physicians reported a clear improvement in pain. Due to the amount of data hitherto and the limitations in the accompanying survey, the results should not be overinterpreted in terms of efficacy and should always be related to existing reviews. The lower age and higher proportion of men among patients treated with cannabis flowers were remarkable. At 37.6%, the overall drop-out rate was high. The most frequent side effects related to vigilance and are therefore highly relevant in terms of driving ability, work ability and risk of falling. For a differentiated evaluation of treatment success, more data needs to be available.

Indexed as

CannabisMedical MarijuanaPainPain ManagementPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultDemographyFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultMedical MarijuanaAccompanying surveyAdverse reactionsDronabinolPain symptomsPreliminary results

Identifiers

PMID31432246
OpenAlexW2989816201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.