ArticleMolecular medicine reports2019
Homoharringtonine enhances the effect of imatinib on chronic myelogenous leukemia cells by downregulating ZFX.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Homoharringtonine: mechanisms, clinical applications and research progress.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Homoharringtonine: updated insights into its efficacy in hematological malignancies, diverse cancers and other biomedical applications.European journal of medical research · 2024Review
- TMEM16A, a Homoharringtonine Receptor, as a Potential Endogenic Target for Lung Cancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Homoharringtonine (HHT) and imatinib have a synergistic effect in the clinical treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The purpose of the present study was to explore the underlying mechanisms by which HHT enhanced imatinib sensitivity. K562 CML cells were treated with HHT and imatinib separately or in combination. Cell viability was detected by Cell Counting Kit‑8 assay; apoptotic rates and protein expression levels of phosphorylated‑tyrosine (p‑Tyr) and p‑CRK like proto‑oncogene, adaptor protein (p‑Crkl) were analyzed by flow cytometry; zinc‑finger protein, X‑linked (ZFX) overexpression plasmid was transfected to cells using electroporation; western blotting was used to detect the protein expression levels of PI3K, AKT, p‑AKT and ZFX; and reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR was used to measure ZFX mRNA expression levels. The results demonstrated that HHT and imatinib co‑treatment had significant effects of proliferation inhibition and apoptosis induction on K562 CML cells compared with imatinib alone. Co‑treatment also significantly downregulated the expression levels of p‑Tyr, p‑Crkl, PI3K and p‑Akt compared with imatinib or HHT treatment. In addition, HHT downregulated ZFX mRNA and protein expression. ZFX overexpression reversed cell sensitivity to imatinib and HHT and also reduced the HHT‑induced imatinib sensitization by increasing p‑Akt expression. In conclusion, HHT may enhance the effect of imatinib on CML cells by downregulating ZFX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.