Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31432096›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2019

Identification of an eight-lncRNA prognostic model for breast cancer using WGCNA network analysis and a Cox‑proportional hazards model based on L1-penalized estimation.

Zhenbin Liu, Menghu Li, Qi Hua, Yanfang Li, Gang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Theranostic Interpolation of Genomic Instability in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhenbin LiuDepartment of Ulcer and Vascular Surgery, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, P.R. China.
Menghu LiDepartment of Ulcer and Vascular Surgery, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, P.R. China.
Qi HuaDepartment of Ulcer and Vascular Surgery, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, P.R. China.
Yanfang LiDepartment of Ulcer and Vascular Surgery, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, P.R. China.
Gang WangDepartment of Ulcer and Vascular Surgery, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An ever‑increasing number of long noncoding (lnc)RNAs has been identified in breast cancer. The present study aimed to establish an lncRNA signature for predicting survival in breast cancer. RNA expression profiling was performed using microarray gene expression data from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus, followed by the identification of breast cancer‑related preserved modules using weighted gene co‑expression network (WGCNA) network analysis. From the lncRNAs identified in these preserved modules, prognostic lncRNAs were selected using univariate Cox regression analysis in combination with the L1‑penalized (LASSO) Cox‑proportional Hazards (Cox‑PH) model. A risk score based on these prognostic lncRNAs was calculated and used for risk stratification. Differentially expressed RNAs (DERs) in breast cancer were identified using MetaDE. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis pathway enrichment analysis was conducted for these prognostic lncRNAs and the DERs related to the lncRNAs in the preserved modules. A total of five preserved modules comprising 73 lncRNAs were mined. An eight‑lncRNA signature (IGHA1, IGHGP, IGKV2‑28, IGLL3P, IGLV3‑10, AZGP1P1, LINC00472 and SLC16A6P1) was identified using the LASSO Cox‑PH model. Risk score based on these eight lncRNAs could classify breast cancer patients into two groups with significantly different survival times. The eight‑lncRNA signature was validated using three independent cohorts. These prognostic lncRNAs were significantly associated with the cell adhesion molecules pathway, JAK‑signal transducer and activator of transcription 5A pathway, and erbb pathway and are potentially involved in regulating angiotensin II receptor type 1, neuropeptide Y receptor Y1, KISS1 receptor, and C‑C motif chemokine ligand 5. The developed eight‑lncRNA signature may have clinical implications for predicting prognosis in breast cancer. Overall, this study provided possible molecular targets for the development of novel therapies against breast cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorComputational BiologyGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAdultAgedDatabases, GeneticData MiningFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRNA, Long NoncodingBiomarkers, TumorRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID31432096
PMCPMC6713414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.