ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2018
The 8-foot up and go test is the best way to assess physical function in the rheumatoid arthritis clinic.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health-Related Physical Fitness as a Risk Factor for Falls in Elderly People Living in the Community: A Prospective Study in China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Is functional fitness performance a useful predictor of risk of falls among community-dwelling older adults?Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesRA is characterized by poor physical function, which compromises patients' quality of life and outcome. Clinical assessment of function is usually performed using self-reported questionnaires, such as the Multi-Dimensional HAQ (MDHAQ) and the Short Form-36 (physical component) (SF36-PC). However, such subjective measures may not accurately reflect real functional status. This study aimed to determine: (i) which clinically practicable objective test best represents overall physical function; and (ii) the extent to which self-reported subjective functional measures reflect objectively assessed function.
methodsObjective [isometric knee extensor strength, handgrip strength, sit-to-stands in 30 s, 8-foot up and go (8'UG), 50-foot walk (50'W) and estimated aerobic capacity (V̇O
resultsIn rank order of size, averaged correlations (
conclusionOur results show that the most appropriate measure of objective physical function in RA patients is the 8'UG, followed by the 50'W. We found discordance between objectively and subjectively measured function. In clinical practice, an objective measure that is simple and quick to perform, such as the 8'UG, is advocated for assessing real functional status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.