ReviewBone marrow transplantation2019
Toward safer haploidnetical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Which is better, HLA-matched sibling or haploidentical transplantation?Cellular & molecular immunology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of haploidentical HSCT is gaining momentum using either megadose T-cell depleted (TCD) myeloablative HSCT, or T cell replete nonmyeloablative HSCT in conjunction with cyclophosphamide post-transplant (PTCY). However, the risks of myeloablative protocols in the former or prolonged immunosuppression in the later, adversely impacting GVL and anti-pathogen immunity are challenging. Recently, we demonstrated in a stringent BM allografting murine model, that combining megadose TCD HSCT with PTCY, enabled durable chimerism induction without GVHD in the absence of any immune suppression after CY. The outcome of this approach in one a patient with multiple myeloma and one with Hodgkin's disease indicate it might offer an attractive safe protocol for haploidentical HSCT. In addition, preclinical experiments show that donor type anti-third party central memory veto T cells that are administrated with a megadose TCD HSCT can potentially offer an editional tool for safer conditioning protocols. Moreover, proof of concept murine studies demonstrate that genetically manipulated veto cells armed with specific receptors against cancer cells, can survive for months in allogeneic recipients, laying the rational for the use of "off-the shelf " Veto-CAR T cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31431713What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.