Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31431712›Full record

ReviewBone marrow transplantation2019

Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes for clinical use.

Mayela Mendt, Katayoun Rezvani, Elizabeth Shpall

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 260 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
260citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
21.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

260 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 458 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Exosome: an overview on enhanced biogenesis by small molecules.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Advancements in diabetes research and stem cell therapy: a concise review.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025
    Review

200 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mayela MendtStem Cell Transplantation, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Katayoun RezvaniStem Cell Transplantation, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Elizabeth ShpallStem Cell Transplantation, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. eshpall@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are commonly used as a source of cellular therapy due to their strong immunosuppressive and regenerative effects. One of the key mechanisms of MSC efficacy appears to derive from their paracrine activity. Recently, it has been shown that the secretion of different factors through extracellular vesicles known as exosomes, orchestrate the principle mechanisms of action of MSCs after infusion. The use of MSC-derived exosomes may provide considerable advantages over their counterpart live cells, potentially reducing undesirable side effects including infusional toxicities. In this review, we examine clinical trials of MSC-derived exosomes currently in progress for gene delivery, regenerative medicine, and immunomodulation. In addition, we summarize the limitations and clinical potential of this cell-free therapeutic strategy.

Indexed as

AnimalsExosomesHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMice

Identifiers

PMID31431712
OpenAlexW2969798557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.