ReviewBone marrow transplantation2019
Considerations for haploidentical versus unrelated donor transplants.
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic mining and quantification reveal the dominant contribution of non-HLA variations to acute graft-versus-host disease.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2025Article
- Unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for familial platelet disorder/acute myeloid leukemia with germline RUNX1 mutations.International journal of hematology · 2023Article
- Risk factors for adverse outcomes following haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide: a two-center analysis.Annals of hematology · 2022Article
- Current Use of Total Body Irradiation in Haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Review
- Nucleated red blood cell: a feasible quality parameter of cord blood units.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Haploidentical transplantation is increasingly performed worldwide due to novel methods to control alloreactivity between the donor and recipient. This major advancement has increased donor availability to almost all patients in need. Outcomes with haploidenitcal donors have also improved and prompted many groups to compare outcomes between haploidentical and HLA-matched donor transplants. In this review, we provide a summary of available data on haploidentical transplants performed with post transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and HLA-matched unrelated donor transplants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31431699What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.