ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2019
The Design of PE Dx, a CDS to Support Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis in the ED.
Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Academic Detailing as a Health Information Technology Implementation Method: Supporting the Design and Implementation of an Emergency Department-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool to Prevent Future Falls.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Usability of a Human Factors-based Clinical Decision Support in the Emergency Department: Lessons Learned for Design and Implementation.Human factors · 2024Article
- Deployment of a human-centred clinical decision support system for pulmonary embolism: evaluation of impact on quality of diagnostic decisions.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- Retrospective analysis of the human-centered design process used to develop a clinical decision support in the emergency department: PE Dx Study Part 2.Human factors in healthcare · 2023Article
- Post-implementation usability evaluation of a human factors-based clinical decision support for pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis (Dx): PE Dx Study Part 1.Human factors in healthcare · 2023Article
- The decision aid is the easy part: workflow challenges of shared decision making in cancer care.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Human-Centered Design of a Clinical Decision Support for Anemia Screening in Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- A Sociotechnical Systems Framework for the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Delivery.Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making · 2022Article
- Usability barriers and facilitators of a human factors engineering-based clinical decision support technology for diagnosing pulmonary embolism.International journal of medical informatics · 2022Article
- Collaborative design and implementation of a clinical decision support system for automated fall-risk identification and referrals in emergency departments.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Workflow integration analysis of a human factors-based clinical decision support in the emergency department.Applied ergonomics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Designing and implementing clinical decision support (CDS) in health care has been challenging. Attempts have been made to design and implement CDS to support clinical procedures, but many of these CDSs have met user resistance. One possible explanation for the lack of acceptability can be the poor design of the CDS. In this study, we describe the design of PE Dx, a CDS built to support the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED) using human factors methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.