Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31431527›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Correlations between social dominance orientation and political attitudes reflect common genetic underpinnings.

Thomas Haarklau Kleppestø, Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski, Olav Vassend, Espen Røysamb, Nikolai Haahjem Eftedal, Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington, Jonas R Kunst, Lotte Thomsen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialTwin Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The ecology of wealth inequality in animal societies.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas Haarklau KleppestøDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo 0373, Norway; t.h.kleppesto@psykologi.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0001-5342-3478
Nikolai Olavi CzajkowskiDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo 0373, Norway.
Olav VassendDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo 0373, Norway.
Espen RøysambDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo 0373, Norway.
Nikolai Haahjem EftedalDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo 0373, Norway.
Jennifer Sheehy-SkeffingtonDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo 0373, Norway.
Jonas R KunstDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo 0373, Norway.
Lotte ThomsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo 0373, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A foundational question in the social sciences concerns the interplay of underlying causes in the formation of people's political beliefs and prejudices. What role, if any, do genes, environmental influences, or personality dispositions play? Social dominance orientation (SDO), an influential index of people's general attitudes toward intergroup hierarchy, correlates robustly with political beliefs. SDO consists of the subdimensions SDO-dominance (SDO-D), which is the desire people have for some groups to be actively oppressed by others, and SDO-egalitarianism (SDO-E), a preference for intergroup inequality. Using a twin design (

Indexed as

AttitudeSocial DominanceSocial IdentificationTwins, MonozygoticAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonalitySocioeconomic Factorsbehavioral geneticsevolutionpolitical attitudesprejudicesocial dominance

Identifiers

PMID31431527
PMCPMC6731660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.