Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31431485›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Impact of school vaccination mandates on pediatric vaccination coverage: a systematic review.

Devon Greyson, Chris Vriesema-Magnuson, Julie A Bettinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Overcoming Vaccine Hesitancy Using Community-Based Efforts.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Devon GreysonDepartment of Communication (Greyson), University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Greyson, Bettinger), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Greyson, Bettinger) and School of Library, Archival and Information Studies (Vriesema-Magnuson), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC dgreyson@umass.edu.
Chris Vriesema-MagnusonDepartment of Communication (Greyson), University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Greyson, Bettinger), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Greyson, Bettinger) and School of Library, Archival and Information Studies (Vriesema-Magnuson), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
Julie A BettingerDepartment of Communication (Greyson), University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Greyson, Bettinger), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Greyson, Bettinger) and School of Library, Archival and Information Studies (Vriesema-Magnuson), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMandated vaccination for school attendance is a growing strategy internationally. Our aim was to investigate the effects of implementing school vaccination mandates on pediatric population vaccine coverage.

methodsIn this systematic review, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) and the PAIS Index for empirical studies of implementation of a primary or secondary school vaccination requirement published in any language through March 2019 with vaccination rates as an outcome. We sought additional studies by consulting experts, reference lists and grey literature sources. Included studies were too heterogeneous for meta-analysis; thus, we extracted data using a standardized rubric and synthesized the results narratively.

resultsAmong the 4232 citations obtained, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen were conducted with US data, 1 with Italian data, and 1 with Australian data. Four studies examined school-entry mandates, and 16 examined adolescent requirements. An uncontrolled before-after design was used in 10 studies, cross-sectional analysis in 7, a retrospective cohort design in 2, and a prospective cohort in 1. In many cases, increased documentation of coverage followed the addition of new requirements. The exception to this was human papillomavirus vaccination mandates, which were highly controversial, in the United States. The studies contained notable risks of bias, with cointerventions rarely acknowledged or accounted for, and subpopulations often excluded. A substantial risk of ecological fallacy existed for most studies.

interpretationVaccination mandates appear largely associated with increased vaccination coverage, but it is not possible to attribute causality to the mandate in most studies. High-quality implementation research that uses whole-population coverage data and takes into consideration cointerventions, confounders, clustering of unvaccinated populations and context is required.

Identifiers

PMID31431485
PMCPMC6703989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.