Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31431383›Full record

ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2019

Evofosfamide sensitizes esophageal carcinomas to radiation without increasing normal tissue toxicity.

Linda Spiegelberg, Stefan J van Hoof, Rianne Biemans, Natasja G Lieuwes, Damiënne Marcus, Raymon Niemans, Jan Theys, Ala Yaromina, Philippe Lambin, Frank Verhaegen and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linda SpiegelbergDepartment of Precision Medicine, The M-Lab, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Stefan J van HoofDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Rianne BiemansDepartment of Precision Medicine, The M-Lab, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Natasja G LieuwesDepartment of Precision Medicine, The M-Lab, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Damiënne MarcusDepartment of Precision Medicine, The M-Lab, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Raymon NiemansDepartment of Precision Medicine, The M-Lab, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jan TheysDepartment of Precision Medicine, The M-Lab, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Ala YarominaDepartment of Precision Medicine, The M-Lab, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Philippe LambinDepartment of Precision Medicine, The M-Lab, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Frank VerhaegenDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Ludwig J DuboisDepartment of Precision Medicine, The M-Lab, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: ludwig.dubois@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

Worldwide Cancer Research 15-0345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeEsophageal cancer incidence is increasing and is rarely curable. Hypoxic tumor areas cause resistance to conventional therapies, making them susceptible for treatment with hypoxia-activated prodrugs (HAPs). We investigated in vivo whether the HAP evofosfamide (TH-302) could increase the therapeutic ratio by sensitizing esophageal carcinomas to radiotherapy without increasing normal tissue toxicity. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo assess therapeutic efficacy, growth of xenografted esophageal squamous cell (OE21) or adeno (OE19) carcinomas was monitored after treatment with TH-302 (50 mg/kg, QD5) and irradiation (sham or 10 Gy). Short- and long-term toxicity was assessed in a gut mucosa and lung fibrosis irradiation model, sensitive to acute and late radiation injury respectively. Mice were injected with TH-302 (50 mg/kg, QD5) and the abdominal area (sham, 8 or 10 Gy) or the upper part of the right lung (sham, 20 Gy) was irradiated. Damage to normal tissues was assessed 84 hours later by histology and blood plasma citrulline levels (gut) and for up to 1 year by non-invasive micro CT imaging (lung).

resultsThe combination treatment of TH-302 with radiotherapy resulted in significant tumor growth delay in OE19 (P = 0.02) and OE21 (P = 0.03) carcinomas, compared to radiotherapy only. Irradiation resulted in a dose-dependent decrease of crypt survival (P < 0.001), mucosal surface area (P < 0.01) and citrulline levels (P < 0.001) in both tumor and non-tumor bearing animals. On the long-term, irradiation increased CT density in the lung, indicating fibrosis, over time. TH-302 did not influence the radiation-induced short-term and long-term toxicity, confirmed by histological evaluation.

conclusionThe combination of TH-302 and radiotherapy might be a promising approach to improve the therapeutic index for esophageal cancer patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAnimalsCell Line, TumorEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiceNitroimidazolesPhosphoramide MustardsRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckNitroimidazolesPhosphoramide MustardsRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsTH 302Esophageal cancerLong-term lung fibrosisRadiotherapyShort-term gut toxicityTH-302Therapeutic index

Identifiers

PMID31431383
PMCPMC6913516
OpenAlexW2808853989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.