ArticleJournal of biomechanics2019
Subject-specific responses to an adaptive ankle prosthesis during incline walking.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- A review of user needs to drive the development of lower limb prostheses.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022Pooled it
- Motion Analysis of a Frontal Plane Adaptable Prosthetic Foot.Journal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO · 2024Article
- The effects of slope-adaptive prosthetic feet on sloped gait performance and quality in unilateral transtibial prosthesis users: A scoping review.Journal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO · 2024Article
- A Narrative Review of Prosthesis Design Decision Making After Lower-Limb Amputation for Developing Shared Decision-Making Resources.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2024Article
- Biomechanical effects of adding an articulating toe joint to a passive foot prosthesis for incline and decline walking.PloS one · 2024Article
- Unilateral transtibial prosthesis users load their intact limb more than their prosthetic limb during sit-to-stand, squatting, and lifting.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2023Article
- A passive dorsiflexing ankle prosthesis to increase minimum foot clearance during swing.Wearable technologies · 2023Article
- Factors leading to falls in transfemoral prosthesis users: a case series of sound-side stumble recovery responses.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Unilateral below-knee prosthesis users walking on uneven terrain: The effect of adding a toe joint to a passive prosthesis.Journal of biomechanics · 2022Article
- Benefits of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot for ascending and descending slopes.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Adding a toe joint to a prosthesis: walking biomechanics, energetics, and preference of individuals with unilateral below-knee limb loss.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Patient-Preferred Prosthetic Ankle-Foot Alignment for Ramps and Level-Ground Walking.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021Article
- Advanced techniques in amputation surgery and prosthetic technology in the lower extremity.EFORT open reviews · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals with lower-limb amputation often have difficulty walking on slopes, in part due to limitations of conventional prosthetic feet. Conventional prostheses have fixed ankle set-point angles and cannot fully replicate able-bodied ankle dynamics. Microprocessor-controlled ankles have been developed to help overcome these limitations. The objective of this study was to characterize how the slope adaptation feature of a microprocessor-controlled ankle affected individual prosthesis user gait biomechanics during sloped walking. Previous studies on similar microprocessor-controlled ankles have focused on group-level results (inter-subject mean), but did not report individual subject results. Our study builds upon prior work and provides new insight by presenting subject-specific results and investigating to what extent individual responses agree with the group-level results. We performed gait analysis on seven individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation while they walked on a 7.5° incline with a recently redesigned microprocessor-controlled ankle that adjusts ankle set-point angle to the slope. We computed gait kinematics and kinetics, and compared how users walked with vs. without this set-point adjustment. The microprocessor-controlled ankle increased minimum toe clearance for all subjects. Despite the microprocessor-controlled ankle behaving similarly for each user, we observed marked differences in individual responses. For instance, two users switched from a forefoot landing pattern with the microprocessor-controlled ankle locked at neutral angle to rearfoot landing when the microprocessor-controlled ankle adapted to the slope, while two maintained a forefoot and three maintained a rearfoot landing pattern across conditions. Changes in knee angle and moment were also subject-specific. Individual user responses were often not well represented by inter-subject mean. Although the prevailing experimental paradigm in prosthetic gait analysis studies is to focus on group-level analysis, our findings call attention to the high inter-subject variability which may necessitate alternative experimental approaches to assess prosthetic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.