Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31431159›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Controlling invasive rodents via synthetic gene drive and the role of polyandry.

Andri Manser, Stephen J Cornell, Andreas Sutter, Dimitri V Blondel, Megan Serr, John Godwin, Tom A R Price

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Leveraging a natural murine meiotic drive to suppress invasive populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Gene drive: progress and prospects.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  13. Fitness consequences of a non-recombiningProceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andri ManserInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Biosciences Building, Liverpool, UK.
Stephen J CornellInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Biosciences Building, Liverpool, UK.
Andreas SutterCentre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Dimitri V BlondelDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7617, USA.
Megan SerrDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7617, USA.
John GodwinDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7617, USA.
Tom A R PriceInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Biosciences Building, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

House mice are a major ecosystem pest, particularly threatening island ecosystems as a non-native invasive species. Rapid advances in synthetic biology offer new avenues to control pest species for biodiversity conservation. Recently, a synthetic sperm-killing gene drive construct called t-Sry has been proposed as a means to eradicate target mouse populations owing to a lack of females. A factor that has received little attention in the discussion surrounding such drive applications is polyandry. Previous research has demonstrated that sperm-killing drivers are extremely damaging to a male's sperm competitive ability. Here, we examine the importance of this effect on the t-Sry system using a theoretical model. We find that polyandry substantially hampers the spread of t-Sry such that release efforts have to be increased three- to sixfold for successful eradication. We discuss the implications of our finding for potential pest control programmes, the risk of drive spread beyond the target population, and the emergence of drive resistance. Our work highlights that a solid understanding of the forces that determine drive dynamics in a natural setting is key for successful drive application, and that exploring the natural diversity of gene drives may inform effective gene drive design.

Indexed as

Gene Drive TechnologyGenes, SyntheticSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsEcosystemFemaleIntroduced SpeciesIslandsMaleMicePest ControlRodentiaSpermatozoagene drivehouse mouseinvasive speciespest controlpolyandry

Identifiers

PMID31431159
PMCPMC6732378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.