ArticleGlobal health action2019
A critical assessment of the ideological underpinnings of current practice in global health and their historical origins.
Article in Global health action, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- WHO's criteria for ethical health research priority-setting in the context of climate change.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2026Article
- Revealing disparities in representation in knowledge generation and guideline development.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Decolonising global health research: Shifting power for transformative change.PLOS global public health · 2024Review
- Towards a better tomorrow: addressing intersectional gender power relations to eradicate inequities in maternal health.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Review
- Applying a Power Analysis to Everything We Do: A Qualitative Inquiry to Decolonize the Global Health and Development Project Cycle.Global health, science and practice · 2023Article
- Educational approaches to teach students to address colonialism in global health: a scoping review.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- High coverage but low quality of maternal and newborn health services in the coverage cascade: who is benefitted and left behind in accessing better quality health services in Nepal?Reproductive health · 2022Article
- Social accountability and health systems' change, beyond the shock of Covid-19: drawing on histories of technical and activist approaches to rethink a shared code of practice.International journal for equity in health · 2022Article
- Article
- Decolonizing global health: what should be the target of this movement and where does it lead us?Global health research and policy · 2022Article
- We need people's WHO to solve vaccine inequity, and we need it now.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Towards Solving Health Inequities: A Method to Identify Ideological Operation in Global Health Programs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- The implicit ideological function of the global health field and its role in maintaining relations of power.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- What IsGlobal health, science and practice · 2020Article
- Institutionalising global health: a call for ethical reflection.BMJ global health · 2020Review
- Engaging culture and context in mhGAP implementation: fostering reflexive deliberation in practice.BMJ global health · 2020Review
- Axes of alienation: applying an intersectional lens on the social contract during the pandemic response to protect sexual and reproductive rights and health.International journal for equity in health · 2020Article
- The sociopolitical context of the COVID-19 response in South Korea.BMJ global health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.