Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31431129›Full record

SynthesisPalliative medicine2020

Achieving beneficial outcomes for children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions receiving palliative care and their families: A realist review.

Sarah Mitchell, Karina Bennett, Andrew Morris, Anne-Marie Slowther, Jane Coad, Jeremy Dale

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Palliative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Surgeon Perspectives on Cleft Lip and Palate Repair in Patients With Life-Limiting and Terminal Illnesses: An ACPA Member Survey.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. End of life care in paediatric settings: UK national survey.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah MitchellWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1477-7860
Karina BennettWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Andrew MorrisWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Anne-Marie SlowtherWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Jane CoadSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Jeremy DaleWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2014-07-065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative care for children and young people is a growing global health concern with significant resource implications. Improved understanding of

aimThe aim is to investigate beneficial outcomes in palliative care from the perspective of children and families and the contexts and hidden mechanisms through which these outcomes can be achieved.

designThis is a systematic realist review following the RAMESES standards. A protocol has been published in PROSPERO (registration no: CRD42018090646). DATA SOURCES: An iterative literature search was conducted over 2 years (2015-2017). Empirical research and systematic reviews about the experiences of children and families in relation to palliative care were included.

resultsSixty papers were included. Narrative synthesis and realist analysis led to the proposal of context-mechanism-outcome configurations in four conceptual areas: (1) family adaptation, (2) the child's situation, (3) relationships with healthcare professionals and (4) access to palliative care services. The presence of two interdependent contexts, the 'expert' child and family and established relationships with healthcare professionals, triggers mechanisms, including advocacy and affirmation in decision-making, which lead to important outcomes including an ability to place the emphasis of care on lessening suffering. Important child and family outcomes underpin the delivery of palliative care.

conclusionPalliative care is a complex, multifactorial intervention. This review provides in-depth understanding into important contexts in which child and family outcomes can be achieved so that they benefit from palliative care and should inform future service development and practice.

Indexed as

Palliative CareTerminal CareChildFamilyFemaleHumansMaleChildhealthcare facilitiesmanpower and servicespalliative carerealist reviewterminal care

Identifiers

PMID31431129
PMCPMC7074600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.