ArticleCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2019
Assessment of the 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline Recommendations for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation in Cardiac Sarcoidosis.
Article in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Arrhythmias in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Strategies, Risk Stratification for Sudden Cardiac Death, and Contemporary Management-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Surgical Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation in Active Inflammatory Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Rethinking Conventional Timing Paradigms.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phenotyping in cardiac sarcoidosis: simplicity is indeed the ultimate sophistication for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator decisions.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Beyond the Biopsy: Imaging Frontiers in Cardiac Sarcoidosis.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Global Research Trends and Hotspots in Cardiac Devices: A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Prediction of ventricular arrhythmic outcomes in suspected cardiac sarcoidosis: a comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance phenotyping vs. societal recommendations for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement.European heart journal · 2025Article
- Predicting Arrhythmic Risk in Cardiac Sarcoidosis Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement: Location, Location, Location.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- JCS/JHRS 2024 Guideline Focused Update on Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
- Deep learning approaches to predict late gadolinium enhancement and clinical outcomes in suspected cardiac sarcoidosis.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2025Article
- A framework for exclusion of alternative diagnoses in sarcoidosis.Journal of autoimmunity · 2024Review
- Arrhythmias in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Management and Prognostic Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Relationship of Mild to Moderate Impairment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction With Fatal Ventricular Arrhythmic Events in Cardiac Sarcoidosis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Cardiac Sarcoidosis-Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Comprehensive Clinical Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (AICD) Implantation as Secondary Prevention of Cardiac Sarcoidosis-Associated Ventricular Tachycardia.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2024Article
- Cardiac magnetic resonance biomarkers as surrogate endpoints in cardiovascular trials for myocardial diseases.European heart journal · 2023Review
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Arrhythmogenic Substrates in Patients with Systemic Autoimmunity: An Update.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Combined FDG PET/MRI versus Standard-of-Care Imaging in the Evaluation of Cardiac Sarcoidosis.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2023Article
- Optimal left ventricular ejection fraction in risk stratification of patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Management of the arrhythmic manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImplantable cardioverter-defibrillators are used to prevent sudden cardiac death in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. The most recent recommendations for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in these patients are in the 2017 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. These recommendations, based on observational studies or expert opinion, have not been assessed. We aimed to assess them.
methodsWe performed a large retrospective cohort study of patients with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis and known or suspected cardiac sarcoidosis that underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were followed for a composite end point of significant ventricular arrhythmia or sudden cardiac death. The discriminatory performance of the Guideline recommendations was tested using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analyses. The optimal cutoff for the extent of late gadolinium enhancement predictive of the composite end point was determined using the Youden index.
resultsIn 290 patients, the class I and IIa recommendations identified all patients who experienced the composite end point during a median follow-up of 3.0 years. Patients meeting class I recommendations had a significantly higher incidence of the composite end point than those meeting class IIa recommendations. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >35% with >5.7% late gadolinium enhancement on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging was as sensitive as and significantly more specific than LVEF >35% with any late gadolinium enhancement. Patients meeting 2 class IIa recommendations, LVEF >35% with the need for a permanent pacemaker and LVEF >35% with late gadolinium enhancement >5.7%, had high annualized event rates. Excluding 2 class IIa recommendations, LVEF >35% with syncope and LVEF >35% with inducible ventricular arrhythmia, resulted in improved discrimination for the composite end point.
conclusionsWe assessed the Guideline recommendations for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients with known or suspected cardiac sarcoidosis and identified topics for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.