ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019
Modern Trends in Plant Genome Editing: An Inclusive Review of the CRISPR/Cas9 Toolbox.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforming Plant Viruses into Vectors for Next-Generation Agriculture-A Review.Current microbiology · 2026Review
- Multi-Omics Dissection of Drought Stress Responses in Crops: From Molecular Regulatory Networks to Climate-Resilient Breeding Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- From Lab to Field: CRISPRing Major CultivatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The emerging impact of CRISPR and gene editing on global crop improvement.Transgenic research · 2026Review
- Challenges and Opportunities with CRISPR-Based Genome Editing in Legume Crops.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Molecular phylogenetics and evolutionary history ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle-driven CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing: a new frontier in crop improvement.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Agrobacterium tumefaciens-Mediated Genome Editing in Banana.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Improving the Aroma of Millets by Targeting theCurrent genomics · 2025Review
- Molecular breeding approaches for sustainable rice blast management: recent advances and challenges.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Tuning interdomain conjugation to enablemSystems · 2024Article
- Precision genetics tools for genetic improvement of banana.The plant genome · 2024Review
- Rising from the dead: the power of genome editing.Science China. Life sciences · 2023Article
- Plant Genomics-Advancing Our Understanding of Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Deciphering the recent trends in pesticide bioremediation using genome editing and multi-omics approaches: a review.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Review
- Combination of Hairy Root and Whole-Plant Transformation Protocols to Achieve Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Soybean.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Green revolution to genome revolution: driving better resilient crops against environmental instability.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Integrated approaches for increasing plant yield under salt stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Unclasping potentials of genomics and gene editing in chickpea to fight climate change and global hunger threat.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing agricultural productivity via modern breeding strategies is of prime interest to attain global food security. An array of biotic and abiotic stressors affect productivity as well as the quality of crop plants, and it is a primary need to develop crops with improved adaptability, high productivity, and resilience against these biotic/abiotic stressors. Conventional approaches to genetic engineering involve tedious procedures. State-of-the-art OMICS approaches reinforced with next-generation sequencing and the latest developments in genome editing tools have paved the way for targeted mutagenesis, opening new horizons for precise genome engineering. Various genome editing tools such as transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), and meganucleases (MNs) have enabled plant scientists to manipulate desired genes in crop plants. However, these approaches are expensive and laborious involving complex procedures for successful editing. Conversely, CRISPR/Cas9 is an entrancing, easy-to-design, cost-effective, and versatile tool for precise and efficient plant genome editing. In recent years, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has emerged as a powerful tool for targeted mutagenesis, including single base substitution, multiplex gene editing, gene knockouts, and regulation of gene transcription in plants. Thus, CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing has demonstrated great potential for crop improvement but regulation of genome-edited crops is still in its infancy. Here, we extensively reviewed the availability of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing tools for plant biotechnologists to target desired genes and its vast applications in crop breeding research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.