ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019
Comparison and Phylogenetic Analysis of Chloroplast Genomes of Three Medicinal and Edible
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive plastid phylogenomics reveal the phylogeny ofPhytoKeys · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Discrimination of Amomi Fructus From Different Origins Using UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap MS, HS-GC-MS/MS, NMR and MIR Technologies Based On Data Fusion Strategies.Analytical science advances · 2025Article
- Chloroplast genome analysis and phylogenetic position of Polygonatum sinopubescens and comparison with related species.PloS one · 2025Article
- Comprehensive comparative analysis and development of molecular markers for Lasianthus species based on complete chloroplast genome sequences.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Comparative chloroplast genomics of Caryophyllaceae species: insights into sequence variations and phylogenetic evolution.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genome of Pueraria provides insights for species identification, phylogenetic relationships, and taxonomy.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Deciphering the Plastome and Molecular Identities of Six Medicinal "Doukou" Species.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The chloroplast genomes of two medicinal species (Veronica anagallis-aquatica L. and Veronica undulata Wall.) and its comparative analysis with related Veronica species.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparative Phylogenetic Analysis of Ancient Korean Tea "Hadong Cheon-Nyeon Cha (Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of medicinal plants Scutellaria baicalensis and common adulterants based on chloroplast genome sequencing.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Pharmacophylogenetic insights intoFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- The first complete chloroplast genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparative Chloroplast Genomics of 21 Species in Zingiberales with Implications for Their Phylogenetic Relationships and Molecular Dating.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Complete chloroplast genome sequences of the medicinal plant Aconitum transsectum (Ranunculaceae): comparative analysis and phylogenetic relationships.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Comparative analyses of Linderniaceae plastomes, with implications for its phylogeny and evolution.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023Article
- Comparative chloroplast genomes provided insights into the evolution and species identification on the Datureae plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.