Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31430627›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2019

Neurophysiological, linguistic, and cognitive predictors of children's ability to perceive speech in noise.

Elaine C Thompson, Jennifer Krizman, Travis White-Schwoch, Trent Nicol, Ryne Estabrook, Nina Kraus

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04598438 (Music to Enhance Auditory Encoding in Young Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04598438 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Music to Enhance Auditory Encoding in Young Children: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2021 to 2025Enrolled48ConditionsHealthyArmsMusic behavioral early intervention program, Arts and crafts early enhancement program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elaine C ThompsonAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; Department of Communication Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Jennifer KrizmanAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; Department of Communication Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Travis White-SchwochAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; Department of Communication Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Trent NicolAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; Department of Communication Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Ryne EstabrookDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Nina KrausAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; Department of Communication Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; Institute for Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; Department of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: nkraus@northwestern.edu.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

A preschool biomarker for literacyR01HD069414 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI KRAUS, NINA · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Hearing in noise in early childhood: neurophysiological, cognitive, and linguistic mechanismsF31DC016205 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI THOMPSON, ELAINE CHESHIRE · 2017 to 2018
$57k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069414NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC016205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing in noisy environments is a complicated task that engages attention, memory, linguistic knowledge, and precise auditory-neurophysiological processing of sound. Accumulating evidence in school-aged children and adults suggests these mechanisms vary with the task's demands. For instance, co-located speech and noise demands a large cognitive load and recruits working memory, while spatially separating speech and noise diminishes this load and draws on alternative skills. Past research has focused on one or two mechanisms underlying speech-in-noise perception in isolation; few studies have considered multiple factors in tandem, or how they interact during critical developmental years. This project sought to test complementary hypotheses involving neurophysiological, cognitive, and linguistic processes supporting speech-in-noise perception in young children under different masking conditions (co-located, spatially separated). Structural equation modeling was used to identify latent constructs and examine their contributions as predictors. Results reveal cognitive and language skills operate as a single factor supporting speech-in-noise perception under different masking conditions. While neural coding of the F0 supports perception in both co-located and spatially separated conditions, neural timing predicts perception of spatially separated listening exclusively. Together, these results suggest co-located and spatially separated speech-in-noise perception draw on similar cognitive/linguistic skills, but distinct neural factors, in early childhood.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentLinguisticsNoiseAuditory PerceptionChildChild, PreschoolCognitionFemaleForecastingHearingHumansMaleNeurophysiologySpeech PerceptionAuditory developmentAuditory processingCognitionElectrophysiologyFFRLanguageSpeech-in-noise perceptionStructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID31430627
PMCPMC6886664
OpenAlexW2964565402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.