ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2019
Interhemispheric visual competition after multisensory reversal of hemianopia.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The brain can develop conflicting multisensory principles to guide behavior.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Ameliorating Hemianopia with Multisensory Training.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Noise-rearing precludes the behavioral benefits of multisensory integration.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Association Cortex Is Essential to Reverse Hemianopia by Multisensory Training.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021Article
- Stimulus value gates multisensory integration.The European journal of neuroscience · 2021Article
- Using superior colliculus principles of multisensory integration to reverse hemianopia.Neuropsychologia · 2020Article
- Reversing Hemianopia by Multisensory Training Under Anesthesia.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2020Article
- Interhemispheric visual competition after multisensory reversal of hemianopia.The European journal of neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unilateral lesions of visual cortex have the secondary consequence of suppressing visual circuits in the midbrain superior colliculus (SC), collectively producing blindness in contralesional space ("hemianopia"). Recent studies have demonstrated that SC visual responses and contralesional vision can be reinstated by a non-invasive multisensory training procedure in which spatiotemporally concordant visual-auditory pairs are repeatedly presented within the blind hemifield. Despite this recovery of visual responsiveness, the loss of visual cortex was expected to result in permanent deficits in that hemifield, especially when visual events in both hemifields compete for attention and access to the brain's visuomotor circuitry. This was evaluated in the present study in a visual choice paradigm in which the two visual hemifields of recovered cats were simultaneously stimulated with equally valent visual targets. Surprisingly, the expected disparity was not found, and some animals even preferred stimuli presented in the previously blind hemifield. This preference persisted across multiple stimulus intensity levels and there was no indication that animals were less aware of cues in the previously blind hemifield than in its spared counterpart. Furthermore, when auditory cues were combined with visual cues, the enhanced performance they produced on a visual task was no greater in the normal than in the previously blind hemifield. These observations suggest that the multisensory rehabilitation paradigm revealed greater inherent visual information processing potential in the previously blind hemifield than was believed possible given the loss of visual cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.