Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31430368›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2019

The draft genome sequence of the spider Dysdera silvatica (Araneae, Dysderidae): A valuable resource for functional and evolutionary genomic studies in chelicerates.

Jose Francisco Sánchez-Herrero, Cristina Frías-López, Paula Escuer, Silvia Hinojosa-Alvarez, Miquel A Arnedo, Alejandro Sánchez-Gracia, Julio Rozas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Editorial.Development genes and evolution · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. A Giant Genome for a Giant Crayfish (Frontiers in genetics · 2020
    Article
  19. Gene sequence analysis of toxins from the spiderThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jose Francisco Sánchez-HerreroDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona (UB) and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina Frías-LópezDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona (UB) and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Paula EscuerDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona (UB) and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Silvia Hinojosa-AlvarezDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona (UB) and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Miquel A ArnedoDepartament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals, Universitat de Barcelona (UB) and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Alejandro Sánchez-GraciaDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona (UB) and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Julio RozasDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Universitat de Barcelona (UB) and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat de la Universitat de Barcelona

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe present the draft genome sequence of Dysdera silvatica, a nocturnal ground-dwelling spider from a genus that has undergone a remarkable adaptive radiation in the Canary Islands.

resultsThe draft assembly was obtained using short (Illumina) and long (PaciBio and Nanopore) sequencing reads. Our de novo assembly (1.36 Gb), which represents 80% of the genome size estimated by flow cytometry (1.7 Gb), is constituted by a high fraction of interspersed repetitive elements (53.8%). The assembly completeness, using BUSCO and core eukaryotic genes, ranges from 90% to 96%. Functional annotations based on both ab initio and evidence-based information (including D. silvatica RNA sequencing) yielded a total of 48,619 protein-coding sequences, of which 36,398 (74.9%) have the molecular hallmark of known protein domains, or sequence similarity with Swiss-Prot sequences. The D. silvatica assembly is the first representative of the superfamily Dysderoidea, and just the second available genome of Synspermiata, one of the major evolutionary lineages of the "true spiders" (Araneomorphae).

conclusionsDysderoids, which are known for their numerous instances of adaptation to underground environments, include some of the few examples of trophic specialization within spiders and are excellent models for the study of cryptic female choice. This resource will be therefore useful as a starting point to study fundamental evolutionary and functional questions, including the molecular bases of the adaptation to extreme environments and ecological shifts, as well of the origin and evolution of relevant spider traits, such as the venom and silk.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsAnimalsChromosome MappingComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularGene OntologyGenome, MitochondrialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhenotypePhylogenySpidersAraneomorphaeCanary Islandsgenome annotationhybrid genome assembly

Identifiers

PMID31430368
PMCPMC6701490
OpenAlexW2969662174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.