Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31430327›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Effect of multiple use and sterilization on sealing performance of bipolar vessel sealing devices.

Silvia Gardeweg, Barbara Bockstahler, Gilles Duprè

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Silvia GardewegDepartment for Small Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1698-0712
Barbara BockstahlerDepartment for Small Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Gilles DuprèDepartment for Small Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvanced bipolar vessel sealing devices are widely used in human and veterinary medicine to reduce the operation time and intraoperative blood loss. Because most devices are made for a single use, their application is cost intensive. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of multiple uses and sterilization on the performance of bipolar vessel sealing devices.

methodsThe burst pressure of sealed porcine renal arteries was compared between the disposable devices "LigaSure"(Valleylab) and "Caiman"(Braun Vetcare) and the reuseable device "MarSeal"(KLS Martin). Additionally, the influence of the sterilization process was investigated, and the sealing time, number of cutting activations and tissue sticking were noted.

resultsThe disposable devices showed reliable performances over multiple activations and sterilization cycles, except for one Caiman device. Seals created with all devices achieved supra-physiologic burst pressures, with the highest pressure measured in a cycle using a MarSeal device. DISCUSSION: During 25 activations with and without intermittent sterilization, no correlation was found between increasing seal numbers and decreasing burst pressure. However, the number of cycles in our study was limited to five.

conclusionFor limited numbers of cycles and sterilization procedures, seals created with the disposable vessel sealing devices LigaSure and Caiman achieved burst pressures comparaable to those produced with the reuseable MarSeal.

Indexed as

SterilizationSurgical InstrumentsAnimalsPressureRenal ArterySwineVascular Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID31430327
PMCPMC6701801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.