Observational studyPloS one2019
Dosage form suitability in vulnerable populations: A focus on paracetamol acceptability from infants to centenarians.
Observational study in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mid-Term Impact of Kampo Goreisan in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure Receiving Tolvaptan-Incorporated Medical Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Devices for securing and administering pediatric compounded oral liquids: survey results from French university hospitals.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Questionnaire Study to Investigate the Preferences of Children, Parents, and Healthcare Professionals for Different Formulations of Oral Medicinal Products.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Bioequivalence of a New Pediatric Paracetamol Oral Suspension Compared With a Marketed Formulation in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Open-Label Study.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2024Article
- A Guide to Best Practice in Sensory Analysis of Pharmaceutical Formulations.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Influence of Solid Oral Dosage Form Characteristics on Swallowability, Visual Perception, and Handling in Older Adults.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Impact of Tablet Size and Shape on the Swallowability in Older Adults.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Dosage Forms Suitability in Pediatrics: Acceptability of Analgesics and Antipyretics in a German Hospital.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Acceptability of Mebendazole Chewable Tablet in Children Aged 2 to 4 Years in Peru.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Exploring Acceptability Drivers of Oral Antibiotics in Children: Findings from an International Observational Study.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Acceptability in the Older Population: The Importance of an Appropriate Tablet Size.Pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- Microneedle-Based Delivery: An Overview of Current Applications and Trends.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMedicine acceptability is a multi-faceted concept driven by both product and user characteristics. Although a key factor for treatment effectiveness, especially in vulnerable populations, knowledge of those medicine features that best promote individual user acceptability remains fragmented. Focusing on paracetamol, this study has explored the appropriateness of pharmaceutical products in different dosage forms to achieve adequate patient acceptability from infants to centenarians.
methodsThis observational, multicentre, prospective study was carried out in 10 hospitals, 8 nursing homes and over 150 community dispensaries. Observers reported several behaviours/events evaluating acceptability for 1016 different pharmaceutical product uses in paediatrics (<18y.) and 1288 in the elderly (≥65y.). Using mapping and clustering, a multivariate approach offered an intelligible reference framework for each population, providing comprehensive scores: positively or negatively accepted.
resultsAmong all the evaluations supporting the acceptability reference frameworks, there were 502 reports on paracetamol products intake. Herein we focused on the 5 products with ≥30 evaluations. Although oral suspension and powder for oral solution were positively-accepted in the paediatric group, the powder had a higher rate of negative patient reaction (p<0.001). Of those that received this formulation, 72% were ≤8y., and therefore suitable to receive the better accepted oral suspension. In the elderly, patients with swallowing disorders were preferentially treated with such powders (p<0.001), which were less often fully taken than orally disintegrating tablets (p<0.001). Even in those patients ≥90y., capsule formulations appeared to be the best accepted product in patients without swallowing alterations, and thus could be a suitable alternative to the powder in this population.
conclusionsBy better integrating patient characteristics when choosing dosage forms, clinicians and caregivers may improve treatment acceptability and adherence. Moreover, hospitals and healthcare institutions could optimise purchasing to best suit their local population, disseminating information to help staff align specific dosage forms to targeted patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.