ArticlePloS one2019
Hallucinations both in and out of context: An active inference account.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Dual Prediction Error Populations Model of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: Bridging NMDA Hypofunction and Gain Hyperfunction.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Social priors and mentalizing connectivity across autistic and schizotypal traits.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Article
- The phantastic organ: predictive processing in the brain.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Conscious vision: investigating visual hallucination awareness in Lewy body disease.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Emergence and Dynamics of Delusions and Hallucinations Across Stages in Early Psychosis.Biological psychiatry · 2025Article
- Exaggerated perception of change with greater sensory imprecision.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The role of affective states in computational psychiatry.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025Review
- A detailed theory of thalamic and cortical microcircuits for predictive visual inference.Science advances · 2025Article
- Generative models for sequential dynamics in active inference.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Review
- Active Inference in Psychology and Psychiatry: Progress to Date?Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Evidence for Reduced Sensory Precision and Increased Reliance on Priors in Hallucination-Prone Individuals in a General Population Sample.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2024Article
- Functional connectivity in Lewy body disease with visual hallucinations.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Barriers and solutions to the adoption of translational tools for computational psychiatry.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Review
- How the conception of control influences our understanding of actions.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023Review
- Visual Hallucinations in Psychosis: The Curious Absence of the Primary Visual Cortex.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2023Article
- A parahippocampal-sensory Bayesian vicious circle generates pain or tinnitus: a source-localized EEG study.Brain communications · 2023Article
- Everything is connected: Inference and attractors in delusions.Schizophrenia research · 2022Article
- Functional and structural brain network correlates of visual hallucinations in Lewy body dementia.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Integrating Evolutionary, Cultural, and Computational Psychiatry: A Multilevel Systemic Approach.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- A computational lens on menopause-associated psychosis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Hallucinations, including auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH), occur in both the healthy population and in psychotic conditions such as schizophrenia (often developing after a prodromal period). In addition, hallucinations can be in-context (they can be consistent with the environment, such as when one hallucinates the end of a sentence that has been repeated many times), or out-of-context (such as the bizarre hallucinations associated with schizophrenia). In previous work, we introduced a model of hallucinations as false (positive) inferences based on a (Markov decision process) formulation of active inference. In this work, we extend this model to include content-to disclose the computational mechanisms behind in- and out-of-context hallucinations. In active inference, sensory information is used to disambiguate alternative hypotheses about the causes of sensations. Sensory information is balanced against prior beliefs, and when this balance is tipped in the favor of prior beliefs, hallucinations can occur. We show that in-context hallucinations arise when (simulated) subjects cannot use sensory information to correct prior beliefs about hearing a voice, but beliefs about content (i.e. the sequential order of a sentence) remain accurate. When hallucinating subjects also have inaccurate beliefs about state transitions, out-of-context hallucinations occur; i.e. their hallucinated speech content is disordered. Note that out-of-context hallucinations in this setting does not refer to inference about context, but rather to false perceptual inference that emerges when the confidence in-or precision of-sensory evidence is reduced. Furthermore, subjects with inaccurate beliefs about state transitions but an intact ability to use sensory information do not hallucinate and are reminiscent of prodromal patients. This work demonstrates the different computational mechanisms that may underlie the spectrum of hallucinatory experience-from the healthy population to psychotic states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.