ReviewThe British journal of radiology2020
Proton therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toxicity and Survival After Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Versus Passive Scattering Proton Therapy for NSCLC.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2021Trial
- Optimal combination of heart and lung dose parameters in radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.Journal of radiation research · 2026Observational
- Proton Versus Photon Radiotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Updated Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2026Review
- Prediction for cardiac and pulmonary toxicity in a multicentric cohort of advanced stage NSCLC patients using sub-regions of the heart.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Updates in Management of Unresectable Stage III Non Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Radiation Oncology Perspective.Cancers · 2024Review
- On the Way to Accounting for Lung Modulation Effects in Particle Therapy of Lung Cancer Patients-A Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Article
- Comparison of deep inspiration breath hold and free breathing intensity modulated proton therapy of locally advanced lung cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Proton therapy (PT) combined with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer with negative driver genes.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
- Recombinant Endostatin as a Potential Radiosensitizer in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Current Landscape of Therapeutic Resistance in Lung Cancer and Promising Strategies to Overcome Resistance.Cancers · 2022Review
- Article
- Physics of Particle Beam and Hypofractionated Beam Delivery in NSCLC.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2021Review
- Proton therapy special feature: introductory editorial.The British journal of radiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiation therapy is an essential component of treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but can be technically challenging because of the proximity of lung tumors to nearby critical organs or structures. The most effective strategy for reducing radiation-induced toxicity is to reduce unnecessary exposure of normal tissues by using advanced technology; examples from photon (X-ray) therapy have included three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy versus its predecessor, two-dimensional radiation therapy, and intensity-modulated photon radiation therapy versus its predecessor, three-dimensional conformal therapy. Using particle-beam therapy rather than photons offers the potential for further advantages because of the unique depth-dose characteristics of the particles, which can be exploited to allow still higher dose escalation to tumors with greater sparing of normal tissues, with the ultimate goal of improving local tumor control and survival while preserving quality of life by reducing treatment-related toxicity. However, the costs associated with particle therapy with protons are considerably higher than the current state of the art in photon technology, and evidence of clinical benefit from protons is increasingly being demanded to justify the higher financial burden on the healthcare system. Some such evidence is available from preclinical studies, from retrospective, single-institution clinical series, from analyses of national databases, and from single-arm prospective studies in addition to several ongoing randomized comparative trials. This review summarizes the rationale for and challenges of using proton therapy to treat thoracic cancers, reviews the current clinical experience, and suggests topics for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.