Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31430023›Full record

Trial reportHuman brain mapping2019

Widespread higher fractional anisotropy associates to better cognitive functions in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis.

Tina D Kristensen, René C W Mandl, Jayachandra M Raghava, Kasper Jessen, Jens Richardt M Jepsen, Birgitte Fagerlund, Louise B Glenthøj, Christina Wenneberg, Kristine Krakauer, Christos Pantelis and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. European Psychiatric Association guidance on assessment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cognitive Dysfunction as a Risk Factor for Psychosis.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Tina D KristensenCopenhagen Research Center for Mental Health, CORE, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9616-762X
René C W MandlCenter for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, and Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CNSR, Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Jayachandra M RaghavaCenter for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, and Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CNSR, Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Kasper JessenCenter for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, and Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CNSR, Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Jens Richardt M JepsenCenter for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, and Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CNSR, Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Birgitte FagerlundCenter for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, and Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CNSR, Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Louise B GlenthøjCopenhagen Research Center for Mental Health, CORE, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
Christina WennebergCopenhagen Research Center for Mental Health, CORE, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
Kristine KrakauerCenter for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, and Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CNSR, Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Christos PantelisCenter for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, and Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CNSR, Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Merete NordentoftCopenhagen Research Center for Mental Health, CORE, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
Birte Y GlenthøjCenter for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, and Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CNSR, Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Bjørn H EbdrupCenter for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, and Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CNSR, Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Center for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research R13-A1349Center for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research R155-2013-16337Center for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research R25-A2701Mental Health Services of the Capital Region of DenmarkResearch Fund of the Capital Region Denmarkthe Lundbeck FoundationTrygFonden 108119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In schizophrenia patients, cognitive functions appear linked to widespread alterations in cerebral white matter microstructure. Here we examine patterns of associations between regional white matter and cognitive functions in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis. One hundred and sixteen individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis and 49 matched healthy controls underwent 3 T magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging and cognitive assessments. Group differences on fractional anisotropy were tested using tract-based spatial statistics. Group differences in cognitive functions, voxel-wise as well as regional fractional anisotropy were tested using univariate general linear modeling. Multivariate partial least squares correlation analyses tested for associations between patterns of regional fractional anisotropy and cognitive functions. Univariate analyses revealed significant impairments on cognitive functions and lower fractional anisotropy in superior longitudinal fasciculus and cingulate gyrus in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis. Partial least squares correlation analysis revealed different associations between patterns of regional fractional anisotropy and cognitive functions in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis compared to healthy controls. Widespread higher fractional anisotropy was associated with better cognitive functioning for individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, but not for the healthy controls. Furthermore, patterns of cognitive functions were associated with an interaction-effect on regional fractional anisotropy in fornix, medial lemniscus, uncinate fasciculus, and superior cerebellar peduncle. Aberrant associations between patterns of cognitive functions to white matter may be explained by dysmyelination.

Indexed as

AdultAnisotropyBrainCognitionDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMalePsychotic DisordersRisk FactorsWhite MatterYoung Adultcognitiondiffusion tensor imagingpartial least squares correlation analysisultra-high risk for psychosiswhite matter

Identifiers

PMID31430023
PMCPMC6864899
OpenAlexW2969414796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.