Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31429989›Full record

ReviewIndoor air2019

From one species to another: A review on the interaction between chemistry and microbiology in relation to cleaning in the built environment.

Samantha Velazquez, Willem Griffiths, Leslie Dietz, Patrick Horve, Susie Nunez, Jinglin Hu, Jiaxian Shen, Mark Fretz, Chenyang Bi, Ying Xu and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indoor air, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Osmotic Stress Adaptation of Poultry-AssociatedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Risk analysis approaches for microbial ingredients in microbial-based cleaning products.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Micro-Nano Bubbles: A New Field of Eco-Friendly Cleaning.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. ESKAPEE Pathogen Biofilm Control on Surfaces with ProbioticAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Samantha VelazquezBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Willem GriffithsBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Leslie DietzBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Patrick HorveBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Susie NunezBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Jinglin HuDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-3291-6772
Jiaxian ShenDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Mark FretzInstitute for Health and the Built Environment, University of Oregon, Portland, OR.
Chenyang BiDepartment of Civil Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
Ying XuDepartment of Building Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1908-7981
Kevin G Van Den WymelenbergBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Erica M HartmannDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-0966-2014
Suzanne L IshaqBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.ORCID 0000-0002-2615-8055

Funding

CDC HHS 75D30118C02915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the advent of soap, personal hygiene practices have revolved around removal, sterilization, and disinfection-both of visible soil and microscopic organisms-for a myriad of cultural, aesthetic, or health-related reasons. Cleaning methods and products vary widely in their recommended use, effectiveness, risk to users or building occupants, environmental sustainability, and ecological impact. Advancements in science and technology have facilitated in-depth analyses of the indoor microbiome, and studies in this field suggest that the traditional "scorched-earth cleaning" mentality-that surfaces must be completely sterilized and prevent microbial establishment-may contribute to long-term human health consequences. Moreover, the materials, products, activities, and microbial communities indoors all contribute to, or remove, chemical species to the indoor environment. This review examines the effects of cleaning with respect to the interaction of chemistry, indoor microbiology, and human health.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorBuilt EnvironmentDisinfectionHumansMicrobiotaantimicrobial resistance geneschemical interventionindoor microbiologyoccupant healthsurface microbiologyurface chemistry

Identifiers

PMID31429989
PMCPMC6852270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.