Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31429775›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2019

Blood management in fast-track orthopedic surgery: an evidence-based narrative review.

Federico Pennestrì, Nicola Maffulli, Paolo Sirtori, Paolo Perazzo, Francesco Negrini, Giuseppe Banfi, Giuseppe M Peretti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Federico PennestrìIRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Scientific Direction, Milan, Italy.
Nicola MaffulliDepartment of Musculoskeletal Disorders, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy. n.maffulli@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5327-3702
Paolo SirtoriIRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Scientific Direction, Milan, Italy.
Paolo PerazzoIRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Scientific Direction, Milan, Italy.
Francesco NegriniIRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Scientific Direction, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe BanfiIRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Scientific Direction, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe M PerettiIRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Scientific Direction, Milan, Italy.
Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Salerno · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeInnovations able to maintain patient safety while reducing the amount of transfusion add value to orthopedic procedures. Opportunities for improvement arise especially in elective procedures, as long as room for planning is available. Although many strategies have been proposed, there is no consensus about the most successful combination. The purpose of this investigation is to identify information to support blood management strategies in fast-track total joint arthroplasty (TJA) pathway, to (i) support clinical decision making according to current evidence and best practices, and (ii) identify critical issues which need further research. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified conventional blood management strategies in elective orthopedic procedures. We performed an electronic search about blood management strategies in fast-track TJA. We designed tables to match every step of the former with the latter. We submitted the findings to clinicians who operate using fast-track surgery protocols in TJA at our research hospital.

resultsPreoperative anemia detection and treatment, blood anticoagulants/aggregants consumption, transfusion trigger, anesthetic technique, local infiltration analgesia, drainage clamping and removals, and postoperative multimodal thromboprophylaxis are the factors which can add best value to a fast-track pathway, since they provide significant room for planning and prediction.

conclusionThe difference between conventional and fast-track pathways does not lie in the contents of blood management, which are related to surgeons/surgeries, materials used and patients, but in the way these contents are integrated into each other, since elective orthopedic procedures offer significant room for planning. Further studies are needed to identify optimal regimens.

Indexed as

AnemiaAnticoagulantsBlood TransfusionClinical Trials as TopicElective Surgical ProceduresEvidence-Based MedicineHumansOrthopedic ProceduresTime FactorsAnticoagulantsBlood managementEthicsFast-track surgeryHealth care valueJoint replacementOrthopedics

Identifiers

PMID31429775
PMCPMC6701001
OpenAlexW2969699269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.