Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31429773›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2019

Rectal wall dose-volume effect of pre- or post KUSHEN Ningjiaos relationship with 3D brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients.

Xiaojuan Li, Cheng Xiao, Yilin Kong, Weiwei Guo, Wenting Zhan, Gong Li, Xuetao Wang, Bailin Zhang, Lei Gao

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaojuan LiGraduate student of grade 2016, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.232, Waihuandong Road, University Town, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Cheng XiaoGraduate student of grade 2016, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.232, Waihuandong Road, University Town, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yilin KongRadiation Oncology Department, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital (Guangdong Provincial Hosiptal of Chinese Medicine), No. 55, Neihuanxi Road, University Town, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Weiwei GuoRadiation Oncology Department, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital (Guangdong Provincial Hosiptal of Chinese Medicine), No. 55, Neihuanxi Road, University Town, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Wenting ZhanRadiation Oncology Department, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital (Guangdong Provincial Hosiptal of Chinese Medicine), No. 55, Neihuanxi Road, University Town, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Gong LiRadiation Oncology Department, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital (Guangdong Provincial Hosiptal of Chinese Medicine), No. 55, Neihuanxi Road, University Town, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xuetao WangRadiation Therapy Department, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital (Guangdong Provincial Hosiptal of Chinese Medicine), No.55, Neihuanxi Road, University Town, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Bailin ZhangRadiation Therapy Department, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital (Guangdong Provincial Hosiptal of Chinese Medicine), No.55, Neihuanxi Road, University Town, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lei GaoRadiation Oncology Department, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital (Guangdong Provincial Hosiptal of Chinese Medicine), No. 55, Neihuanxi Road, University Town, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. gzgaolei@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4239-7718
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present prospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the rectum following KUSHEN Ningjiaos in cervical cancer. We compared rectal wall changes during brachytherapy with or without KUSHEN Ningjiaos in cervical cancer patients and analyzed the difference in spatial dose distribution, including whole rectum-wall (R-w), anterior rectum-wall (R-a) and posterior rectum-wall (R-p). METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred cervical cancer patients with and without KUSHEN Ningjiaos were treated with brachytherapy (600 cGy). The whole R-w was divided into two areas of R-a and R-p, and R-w dose surface map were constructed. The volume of each R-w was compared in patients pre- and post-KUSHEN Ningjiaos.

resultsWhen the pre- vs. post-KUSHEN groups were compared the volume of R-w increased. In the post-KUSHEN group, a significantly higher proportion of the D2cc of V

conclusionThe insertion of KUSHEN Ningjiaos can protect the rectum. KUSHEN Ningjiaos appears to be safe and well tolerated; therefore, we believe that there will be fewer adverse events after brachytherapy for patients.

trial registrationA multi-center, prospective clinical trial for KUSHEN Ningjiaos was inserted into rectum to reduce the rate of radiation proctitis in three-dimensional brachytherapy of cervical cancer. ChiCTR1900021631 . 2 Mar 2019-Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyDrugs, Chinese HerbalFemaleHumansProctitisPrognosisProspective StudiesRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy DosageRectumRetrospective StudiesUrinary BladderUterine Cervical NeoplasmsDrugs, Chinese HerbalkushenBrachytherapyCervical cancerMatrineRectumUterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31429773
PMCPMC6700783
OpenAlexW2969473488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.