Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31429737›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2019

Targeted sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA in stage II-III resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Pei Meng, Jiacong Wei, Yiqun Geng, Shaobin Chen, Miente Martijn Terpstra, Qiongyi Huang, Qian Zhang, Zuoqing Su, Wanchun Yu, Min Su and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Pei MengProvincial Key laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Collaborative and Creative Centre, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Jiacong WeiProvincial Key laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Collaborative and Creative Centre, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Yiqun GengProvincial Key laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Collaborative and Creative Centre, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Shaobin ChenDepartment of Thoracic surgery, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Miente Martijn TerpstraDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9700RB, Groningen, Netherlands.
Qiongyi HuangProvincial Key laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Collaborative and Creative Centre, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Qian ZhangProvincial Key laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Collaborative and Creative Centre, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Zuoqing SuProvincial Key laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Collaborative and Creative Centre, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Wanchun YuProvincial Key laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Collaborative and Creative Centre, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Min SuDepartment of Pathology & Institute of Clinical Pathology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Klaas KokDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9700RB, Groningen, Netherlands.
Anke van den BergDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9700RB, Groningen, Netherlands.
Jiang GuProvincial Key laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Collaborative and Creative Centre, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China. 2523381625@qq.com.
Shantou University · CNShantou University Medical College · CNUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLCancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College · CNUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81200712National Natural Science Foundation of China 81872334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the potential of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a disease biomarker in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) that can be used for treatment response evaluation and early detection of tumour recurrence.

methodsMatched tumour tissue, pre- and post-surgery plasma and WBCs obtained from 17 ESCC patients were sequenced using a panel of 483 cancer-related genes.

resultsSomatic mutations were detected in 14 of 17 tumour tissues. Putative harmful mutations were observed in genes involved in well-known cancer-related pathways, including PI3K-Akt/mTOR signalling, Proteoglycans in cancer, FoxO signalling, Jak-STAT signalling, Chemokine signalling and Focal adhesion. Forty-six somatic mutations were found in pre-surgery cfDNA in 8 of 12 patients, with mutant allele frequencies (MAF) ranging from 0.24 to 4.91%. Three of the 8 patients with detectable circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) had stage IIA disease, whereas the others had stage IIB-IIIB disease. Post-surgery cfDNA somatic mutations were detected in only 2 of 14 patients, with mutant allele frequencies of 0.28 and 0.36%. All other somatic mutations were undetectable in post-surgery cfDNA, even in samples collected within 3-4 h after surgery.

conclusionOur study shows that somatic mutations can be detected in pre-surgery cfDNA in stage IIA to IIIB patients, and at a lower frequency in post-surgery cfDNA. This indicates that cfDNA could potentially be used to monitor disease load, even in low disease-stage patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBase SequenceBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNACohort StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene FrequencyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNACirculating cell-free DNANext-generation sequencingOesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID31429737
PMCPMC6701116
OpenAlexW2969559062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.