Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31429482›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2019

Do independent treatment centers offer more value than general hospitals? The case of cataract care.

Florien M Kruse, Stef Groenewoud, Femke Atsma, Onno P van der Galiën, Eddy M M Adang, Patrick P T Jeurissen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Public funding for private for-profit centres and access to cataract surgery by patient socioeconomic status: an Ontario population-based study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  4. The Eye-Opening Truth About Private Surgical Facilities in Canada.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Florien M KruseScientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3850-9331
Stef GroenewoudScientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Femke AtsmaScientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Onno P van der GaliënZilveren Kruis, Leusden, The Netherlands.
Eddy M M AdangDepartment of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Patrick P T JeurissenScientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify differences between independent treatment centers (ITCs) and general hospitals (GHs) regarding costs, quality of care, and efficiency. DATA SOURCES: Anonymous claims data (2013-2015) were used. We also obtained quality indicators from a semipublic platform. STUDY

designThis study uses a comparative multilevel analysis, controlling for case mix, to evaluate the performance of ITCs and GHs for patients diagnosed with cataract. DATA COLLECTION: Reimbursement claims were extracted from existing claims databases of the largest Dutch health insurer. Quality indicators were obtained by external agencies through a mixed-mode survey. PRINCIPAL

findingsThere are no stark differences in complexity of cases for cataract care. ITCs seem to perform surgeries more frequently per care pathway, but conduct a lower number of health care activities per surgical claim. Total average costs are lower in ITCs compared with GHs, but when adjusted for case mix, the differences in costs are lower. The findings with the adjusted quality differences suggest that ITCs outperform GHs on patient satisfaction, but patients' outcomes are similar.

conclusionThis finding supports the postulation-based on the focus factory theory-that ITCs can provide more value for cataract care than GHs.

Indexed as

CataractFemaleHealth Care CostsHealth Facilities, ProprietaryHospitals, GeneralHumansMaleUnited Statesefficiencyhealth care costsindependent treatment centersquality of carevalue

Identifiers

PMID31429482
PMCPMC6863231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.