ArticleAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2019
Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression.
Article in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are We Ready to De-Escalate Surveillance for Low-Risk IPMN?Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Patients' Attitude toward Less Frequent Surveillance of Low-Risk Pancreatic Cysts: A Multicenter European Cohort Study.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025Observational
- [Diagnostics and clinical management of premalignant diseases of the pancreas].Der Internist · 2022Review
- International external validation of a stratification tool to identify branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022Article
- Risk stratification tools for branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022Article
- Updates in diagnosis and management of pancreatic cysts.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- High-Risk Characteristics Associated with Advanced Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Results from a Retrospective Surgical Cohort.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Article
- A Review of the Diagnosis and Management of Premalignant Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Factors Associated With the Risk of Progression of Low-Risk Branch-Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2019Article
- Risk Assessment and Radiomics Analysis in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMN).Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBecause most pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) will never become malignant, currently advocated long-term surveillance is low-yield for most individuals.
aimTo develop a score chart identifying IPMNs at lowest risk of developing worrisome features or high-risk stigmata.
methodsWe combined prospectively maintained pancreatic cyst surveillance databases of three academic institutions. Patients were included if they had a presumed side-branch IPMN, without worrisome features or high-risk stigmata at baseline (as defined by the 2012 international Fukuoka guidelines), and were followed ≥ 12 months. The endpoint was development of one or more worrisome features or high-risk stigmata during follow-up. We created a multivariable prediction model using Cox-proportional logistic regression analysis and performed an internal-external validation.
results875 patients were included. After a mean follow-up of 50 months (range 12-157), 116 (13%) patients developed worrisome features or high-risk stigmata. The final model included cyst size (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.15), cyst multifocality (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.18), ever having smoked (HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.95-2.04), history of acute pancreatitis (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.21-3.55), and history of extrapancreatic malignancy (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.91-1.97). After validation, the model had good discriminative ability (C-statistic 0.72 in the Mayo cohort, 0.71 in the Columbia cohort, 0.64 in the Erasmus cohort).
conclusionIn presumed side branch IPMNs without worrisome features or high-risk stigmata at baseline, the Dutch-American Risk stratification Tool (DART-1) successfully identifies pancreatic lesions at low risk of developing worrisome features or high-risk stigmata.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.