Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31429105›Full record

ArticleAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2019

Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression.

Kasper A Overbeek, Maaike Alblas, Valerie Gausman, Pujan Kandel, Adam B Schweber, Christian Brooks, Priscilla A Van Riet, Michael B Wallace, Tamas A Gonda, Djuna L Cahen and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Patients' Attitude toward Less Frequent Surveillance of Low-Risk Pancreatic Cysts: A Multicenter European Cohort Study.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
    Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Updates in diagnosis and management of pancreatic cysts.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kasper A OverbeekDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1829-9963
Maaike AlblasDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2690-8810
Valerie GausmanDepartment of Medicine, NYU - Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3142-0772
Pujan KandelDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA.
Adam B SchweberDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.
Christian BrooksDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.
Priscilla A Van RietDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8193-5868
Michael B WallaceDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6446-5785
Tamas A GondaDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.
Djuna L CahenDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6753-4857
Marco J BrunoDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9181-5499

Funding

Champion for Hope Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause most pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) will never become malignant, currently advocated long-term surveillance is low-yield for most individuals.

aimTo develop a score chart identifying IPMNs at lowest risk of developing worrisome features or high-risk stigmata.

methodsWe combined prospectively maintained pancreatic cyst surveillance databases of three academic institutions. Patients were included if they had a presumed side-branch IPMN, without worrisome features or high-risk stigmata at baseline (as defined by the 2012 international Fukuoka guidelines), and were followed ≥ 12 months. The endpoint was development of one or more worrisome features or high-risk stigmata during follow-up. We created a multivariable prediction model using Cox-proportional logistic regression analysis and performed an internal-external validation.

results875 patients were included. After a mean follow-up of 50 months (range 12-157), 116 (13%) patients developed worrisome features or high-risk stigmata. The final model included cyst size (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.15), cyst multifocality (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.18), ever having smoked (HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.95-2.04), history of acute pancreatitis (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.21-3.55), and history of extrapancreatic malignancy (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.91-1.97). After validation, the model had good discriminative ability (C-statistic 0.72 in the Mayo cohort, 0.71 in the Columbia cohort, 0.64 in the Erasmus cohort).

conclusionIn presumed side branch IPMNs without worrisome features or high-risk stigmata at baseline, the Dutch-American Risk stratification Tool (DART-1) successfully identifies pancreatic lesions at low risk of developing worrisome features or high-risk stigmata.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreasPancreatic CystPancreatic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesRisk

Identifiers

PMID31429105
PMCPMC6772152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.