Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31429039›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2020

Outcomes of extraskeletal vs. skeletal Ewing sarcoma patients treated with standard chemotherapy protocol.

S Salah, F Abuhijla, T Ismail, S Yaser, I Sultan, H Halalsheh, A Shehadeh, S Abdelal, A Almousa, O Jaber and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [European radiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Primary Ewing Sarcoma of the Stomach.World journal of oncology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S SalahMedical Oncology Department, King Hussein Cancer Center, Queen Rania Al Abdullah St 202, Amman, 11941, Jordan. samer.salahmd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7421-2522
F AbuhijlaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
T IsmailDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
S YaserMedical Oncology Department, King Hussein Cancer Center, Queen Rania Al Abdullah St 202, Amman, 11941, Jordan.
I SultanDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
H HalalshehDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
A ShehadehDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
S AbdelalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
A AlmousaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
O JaberDepartment of Pathology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
R Abu-HijlihDepartment of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
King Hussein Cancer Center · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the outcomes of extraskeletal and skeletal Ewing sarcomas treated with standard chemotherapy protocol.

methodsWe retrospectively collected data on primary localized skeletal and extraskeletal ES patients. Demographics and disease characteristics were compared between the two groups. The influence of presentation (skeletal vs. extraskeletal) on overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was assessed and compared by the log-rank test.

resultsA total of 120 patients were included; 29 (24%) had extraskeletal and 91 (76%) had skeletal ES. All patients received vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with ifosfamide and etoposide (VDC-IE) chemotherapy, with a plan for local control at week 12. At a median follow-up of 38 months, there was no difference in OS between skeletal and extraskeletal ES; 5-year OS 70% and 67% respectively, p = 0.96. Patients with extraskeletal ES had inferior 5-year LRFS compared to skeletal ES; 74% vs. 83%; p = 0.042. Local recurrence occurred at a higher frequency in the extraskeletal group; 28% vs. 11%, p = 0.034, although more extraskeletal patients received adjuvant radiotherapy; 73% vs. 36%, p = 0.01. Among patients who underwent surgery (n = 76), there was no difference in R0 resection rate (skeletal: 89%, extraskeletal: 86%, p = 0.52, or good ( ≥ 90%) tumor necrosis; skeletal: 54%, extraskeletal: 38%, p = 0.31.

conclusionPatients with localized extraskeletal ES have comparable OS outcomes to patients with skeletal ES utilizing the standard VDC-IE chemotherapy. However, extraskeletal patients are at significantly higher risk for local recurrence.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBone NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinEtoposideHumansIfosfamideNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesSarcoma, EwingSoft Tissue NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeVincristineCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinEtoposideIfosfamideVincristineChemotherapyEwing sarcomaRadiotherapySurvival

Identifiers

PMID31429039
OpenAlexW2969796380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.