ArticleGenes & genomics2019
Improving classification accuracy of cancer types using parallel hybrid feature selection on microarray gene expression data.
Article in Genes & genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel and innovative cancer classification framework through a consecutive utilization of hybrid feature selection.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- A Novel Proposal for Deep Learning-Based Diabetes Prediction: Converting Clinical Data to Image Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Accurate detection of COVID-19 patients based on distance biased Naïve Bayes (DBNB) classification strategy.Pattern recognition · 2021Article
- Detecting COVID-19 patients based on fuzzy inference engine and Deep Neural Network.Applied soft computing · 2021Article
- Detecting biomarkers from microarray data using distributed correlation based gene selection.Genes & genomics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundData mining techniques are used to mine unknown knowledge from huge data. Microarray gene expression (MGE) data plays a major role in predicting type of cancer. But as MGE data is huge in volume, applying traditional data mining approaches is time consuming. Hence parallel programming frameworks like Hadoop, Spark and Mahout are necessary to ease the task of computation.
objectiveNot all the gene expressions are necessary in prediction, it is very essential to select important genes for improving classification accuracy. So feature selection algorithms are parallelized and executed on Spark framework to eliminate unnecessary genes and identify only predictive genes in very less time without affecting prediction accuracy.
methodsParallelized hybrid feature selection (HFS) method is proposed to serve the purpose. This method includes parallelized correlation feature subset selection followed by rank-based feature selection methods. The selected subset of genes is evaluated using parallel classification algorithms. The accuracy values obtained are compared with existing rank-weight feature selection, parallelized recursive feature selection methods and also with the values obtained by executing parallelized HFS on DistributedWekaSpark.
resultsThe classification accuracy obtained with the proposed parallelized HFS method is 97% and 79% for gastric cancer and childhood leukemia respectively. The proposed parallelized HFS method produced ~ 4% to ~ 15% improvement in classification accuracy when compared with previous methods.
conclusionThe results reveal the fact that the proposed parallelized feature selection algorithm is scalable to growing medical data and predicts cancer sub-types in lesser time with higher accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31429008What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.