Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31428986›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019

Secure Messaging with Physicians by Proxies for Patients with Diabetes: Findings from the ECLIPPSE Study.

Wagahta Semere, Scott Crossley, Andrew J Karter, Courtney R Lyles, William Brown, Mary Reed, Danielle S McNamara, Jennifer Y Liu, Dean Schillinger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Wagahta SemereDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. wagahta.semere@ucsf.edu.
Scott CrossleyDepartment of Applied Linguistics and English as a Second Language, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Andrew J KarterDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Courtney R LylesDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
William BrownCenter for AIDS Prevention Studies, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mary ReedDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Danielle S McNamaraDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Jennifer Y LiuDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Dean SchillingerDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USKaiser Permanente · USArizona State University · USGeorgia State University · USSan Francisco General Hospital · US

Funding

Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
The Next Frontier in Diabetes Communication: Promoting Health Literacy in the Era of Secure MessagingR01LM012355 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KARTER, ANDREW JOHN, SCHILLINGER, DEAN · 2015 to 2018
$2.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about patients who have caregiver proxies communicate with healthcare providers via portal secure messaging (SM). Since proxy portal use is often informal (e.g., sharing patient accounts), novel methods are needed to estimate the prevalence of proxy-authored SMs.

objective(1) Develop an algorithm to identify proxy-authored SMs, (2) apply this algorithm to estimate predicted proxy SM (PPSM) prevalence among patients with diabetes, and (3) explore patient characteristics associated with having PPSMs.

designRetrospective cohort study.

participantsWe examined 9856 patients from Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE) who sent ≥ 1 English-language SM to their primary care physician between July 1, 2006, and Dec. 31, 2015. MAIN MEASURES: Using computational linguistics, we developed ProxyID, an algorithm that identifies phrases frequently found in registered proxy SMs. ProxyID was validated against blinded expert categorization of proxy status among an SM sample, then applied to identify PPSM prevalence across patients. We examined patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics according to PPSM penetrance, "none" (0%), "low" (≥ 0-50%), and "high" (≥ 50-100%). KEY

resultsOnly 2.3% of patients had ≥ 1 registered proxy-authored SM. ProxyID demonstrated moderate agreement with expert classification (Κ = 0.58); 45.7% of patients had PPSMs (40.2% low and 5.5% high). Patients with high percent PPSMs were older than those with low percent and no PPSMs (66.5 vs 57.4 vs 56.2 years, p < 0.001) had higher rates of limited English proficiency (16.1% vs 3.2% vs 3.5%, p < 0.05), lower self-reported health literacy (3.83 vs 4.43 vs 4.44, p < 0.001), and more comorbidities (Charlson index 3.78 vs 2.35 vs 2.18, p < 0.001).

conclusionsAmong patients with diabetes, informal proxy SM use is more common than registered use and prevalent among socially and medically vulnerable patients. Future research should explore whether proxy portal use improves patient and/or caregiver outcomes and consider policies that integrate caregivers in portal communication.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedCaregiversConfidentialityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Electronic MailFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProxyRetrospective Studiescaregivingdiabeteshealth communicationhealth information technology (health IT)

Identifiers

PMID31428986
PMCPMC6848304
OpenAlexW2969378577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.