ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2020
Phytostabilization potential of Erica australis L. and Nerium oleander L.: a comparative study in the Riotinto mining area (SW Spain).
Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Mediterranean Native Plants for the Phytoremediation of Mining Sites: An Overview of the Past and Present, and Perspectives for the Future.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Capacity ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Tissue Distribution and Biochemical Changes in Response to Copper Accumulation inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Soil contamination and human health: part 2.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phytostabilization is a green, cost-effective technique for mine rehabilitation and ecological restoration. In this study, the phytostabilization capacity of Erica australis L. and Nerium oleander L. was assessed in the climatic and geochemical context of the Riotinto mining district, southwestern Spain, where both plant species colonize harsh substrates of mine wastes and contaminated river banks. In addition to tolerating extreme acidic conditions (up to pH 3.36 for E. australis), both species were found to grow on substrates very poor in bioavailable nutrients (e.g., N and P) and highly enriched with potentially phytotoxic elements (e.g., Cu, Cd, Pb, S). The selective root absorption of essential elements and the sequestration of potentially toxic elements in the root cortex are the main adaptations that allow the studied species to cope in very limiting edaphic environments. Being capable of a tight elemental homeostatic control and tolerating extreme acidic conditions, E. australis is the best candidate for use in phytostabilization programs, ideally to promote early stages of colonization, improve physical and chemical conditions of substrates and favor the establishing of less tolerant species, such as N. oleander.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31428945What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.