ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2020
Support vector machine based classification of smokers and nonsmokers using diffusion tensor imaging.
Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alterations of gray matter asymmetry in internet gaming disorder.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Implications of neuroimaging findings in addiction.Psychoradiology · 2023Review
- Machine learning approaches for parsing comorbidity/heterogeneity in antisociality and substance use disorders: A primer.Personality neuroscience · 2021Article
- Wave Intensity Analysis Combined With Machine Learning can Detect Impaired Stroke Volume in Simulations of Heart Failure.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Dynamic Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Smoking in Young Smokers.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite significant progress in treatments for smoking cessation, smoking continues to be a significant public health concern, especially in young adulthood. Thus, developing a predictive model that can classify and characterize the brain-based biomarkers predicting smoking status would be imperative to improving treatment development. In this study, we applied a support vector machine-based classification method to discriminate 70 young male smokers and 70 matched nonsmokers using their diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data. The classification procedure achieved an average accuracy of 88.6% and an average area under the curve of 0.95. The most discriminative features that contributed to the classification were primarily located in the sagittal stratum (SS), external capsule (EC), superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), anterior corona radiata (ACR) and inferior front-occipital fasciculus (IFOF). The following regression analysis showed a significant negatively correlation between the average RD values of the left ACR (r = -0.247, p = 0.039) and FTND. The average MD values in the right EC (r = -0.254, p = 0.034) and RD values in the right IFOF (r = -0.240, p = 0.046) were inversely associated with pack-years. Our findings indicate that the discriminative white matter (WM) features as brain biomarkers provide great predictive power for smoking status and suggest that machine learning techniques can reveal underlying smoking-related neurobiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.