Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31428879›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2019

Understanding the Tabletability Differences between Indomethacin Polymorphs Using Powder Brillouin Light Scattering.

Beth A Young, Dherya Bahl, Lewis L Stevens

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beth A YoungDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA.
Dherya BahlDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA.
Lewis L StevensDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA. lewis-stevens@uiowa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2936-0926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe unconventional tabletability of the indomethacin polymorphs - α and γ - are investigated from a topological and mechanical perspective using powder Brillouin light scattering (p-BLS) to identify the specific structure-performance relationship in these materials.

methodIndomethacin (γ-form) was purchased and used to prepare the α polymorph. Powder X-ray diffraction was used to confirm phase identity, while p-BLS was used to obtain the mechanical properties. Energy frameworks were determined with Crystal Explorer to visualize the interaction topologies. Using a Carver press and a stress-strain analyzer, the tableting performance of each polymorph was determined.

resultsPolymorph-specific acoustic frequency distributions were observed with distinct, zero-porosity, aggregate elastic moduli determined. The p-BLS spectra for α-indomethacin display a population of low-velocity shear modes, indicating a direction of facilitated shear. This improves slip-mediated plasticity and tabletability. Our p-BLS spectra experimentally indicates that a low-energy slip system is available to α-indomethacin which supports ours and previous energy framework calculations. Despite a 2d-layered crystal motif favorable for shear deformation, the γ-form displays a higher shear modulus that is supported by our hydrogen-bonding analysis of γ-indomethacin.

conclusionOur experimental, mechanical data is consistent with the predicted interaction topologies and these two inputs combined permit a comprehensive, molecular understanding of polymorph-specific tabletability.

Indexed as

CrystallizationDimerizationDrug CompoundingHydrogen BondingIndomethacinLightMechanical PhenomenaPorosityPowdersScattering, RadiationTabletsThermodynamicsIndomethacinPowdersTabletscrystal engineeringmechanical propertiespolymorphssolid-statetablets

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.