ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2019
[Surgery of large and persistent macular holes].
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Covering corneal stromal lenticule for macular hole in pathological myopia.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Amniotic membrane for covering high myopic macular hole associated with retinal detachment following failed primary surgery.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Anatomical and functional outcomes one year after vitrectomy and retinal massage for large macular holes.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- [Biomarkers in full-thickness and lamellar defects of the macula].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Review
- [Macular detachment for treatment of large, persistent and chronic macular holes].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern macular hole surgery results in high closure rates of over 90% and good functional results especially in macular holes up to 400 µm in diameter. The standard of care in most of these cases consists of transconjunctival sutureless pars plana vitrectomy, peeling of the inner limiting membrane (ILM) around the hole, followed by gas tamponade and positioning of the patient. As closure rates and functional results decrease with larger macular hole diameters over approximately 400 µm, alternative surgical techniques have been introduced to improve anatomical and functional results in these cases. These techniques include the positioning of tissue within the macular hole to improve hole closure. This can be performed using an ILM flap or free flap technique and the transplantation of autologous retinal tissue, lens capsule or homologous amniotic tissue in or under the defect. An alternative promising approach is the attenuation of the rim of the hole by induction of a localized retinal detachment at the posterior pole which is achieved by subretinal injection of balanced salt solution (BSS) using a 41 gauge needle. The operation is completed by an endotamponade using gas or silicone oil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.