Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31428810›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2019

[Importance of FDG-PET/computed tomography in colorectal cancer].

S Kleiner, W Weber

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. FAP-targeted PET imaging in gastrointestinal malignancies: a comprehensive review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Review
  2. Metabolic activity viaBMC cancer · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S KleinerNuklearmedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland. sebastian.kleiner@mri.tum.de.
W WeberNuklearmedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHybrid imaging FDG PET/CT ( DIAGNOSIS: A focal increase in FDG uptake in the gastrointestinal tract may be due to colorectal carcinoma. Such a finding requires further clarification. PRIMARY STAGING: Staging of the primary and locoregional lymph nodes remains a domain of established imaging modalities as FDG PET/CT does not provide a clear additional benefit. Liver metastases can be detected with high sensitivity by FDG PET/CT, but MRI is superior in small lesions. RADIATION THERAPY PLANNING: So far FDG PET/CT plays a subordinate role in the radiation therapy planning of rectal cancer. However, it can potentially contribute to the optimization of planning target volumes. THERAPY MONITORING: FDG PET/CT is suitable for monitoring therapy because morphological and metabolic changes of the tumor can be detected in early stages. This enables early detection of nonresponders after beginning neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy of rectal cancer. FDG PET/CT can also be used for therapy control of liver metastases, especially after local therapeutic procedures. DETECTION OF RECURRENCE: With clinical suspicion of local recurrence and increased tumor markers, FDG PET/CT is a valuable tool as tumor recurrence can be detected with high sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsSensitivity and SpecificityFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsColorectal neoplasmsMultimodal ImagingRecurrenceStagingTherapy monitoring

Identifiers

PMID31428810
OpenAlexW2969446483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.