Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31428704›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2019

Stratification of inflammatory bowel disease outpatients by disease activity and risk of complications to guide out-of-hospital monitoring: a patient-centred quality improvement project.

Rishi K Fofaria, Susan Barber, Yewande Adeleke, Tom Woodcock, Nikolaos Kamperidis, Alaa Mohamed, Ravi Misra, Ajit Shah, Susan Bailey-Fee, Howard Bluston and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Patient and Public Involvement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research-A Scoping Review.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The 2023 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Access to and Models of Care.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rishi K FofariaSt Mark's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1058-7584
Susan BarberNIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Northwest London, London, UK.
Yewande AdelekeNIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Northwest London, London, UK.
Tom WoodcockNIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Northwest London, London, UK.
Nikolaos KamperidisSt Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
Alaa MohamedSt Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
Ravi MisraSt Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
Ajit ShahNHS Brent Clinical Commissioning Group, Wembley, London, UK.
Susan Bailey-FeePatient Panel, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
Howard BlustonPatient Panel, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
Denise RobinsonSt Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
Tracey TyrrellSt Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
Naila ArebiSt Mark's Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic relapsing-remitting condition affecting 600 000 people in the UK. Traditionally, patients attend outpatient clinics for monitoring regardless of their symptoms or risk of developing complications. This can lead to a mismatch between need and access: patients in remission given elective appointments displace those in need of urgent specialist attention. Novel initiatives implemented in the UK to improve outpatient monitoring have often required a well-maintained patient registry, empowered patients and significant information technology support. DESIGN AND STRATEGY: In this large-scale quality improvement project at St Mark's Hospital, a tertiary centre for IBD, we stratified over 1000 patients attending three non-complex IBD clinics over 12 months according to disease activity and risk profile. The aim was to offer a choice and subsequently transfer 50% of eligible patients to specialist nurse-led telephone clinics and demonstrate non-inferior satisfaction levels to existing outpatient follow-up. We also sought to ensure there was timely access to a newly established rapid access clinic for patients requiring urgent specialist attention.A core project team consisting of healthcare professionals, patients and quality improvement scientists met regularly. The team tested and scaled up interventions using 'Plan-Do-Study-Act' cycles within the 'Model for Improvement' framework and analysed data continuously using statistical process charts.

resultsOver 12 months, the average number of eligible patients transferred to telephone clinics rose from 17.6% (42/239) using a questionnaire method to 59.3% (73/123) using active discussion in clinic. Patient satisfaction scores remained high and non-inferior to baseline scores in face-to-face clinics. The median waiting time to be seen in the rapid access clinic was 6.5 days.

conclusionThis is the first published study to report on the successful stratification of patients with IBD based on disease activity and risk of complications to create a more responsive, sustainable and patient-centred model for IBD monitoring.

Indexed as

chronic disease managementhospital medicineoutpatientspatient-centred carequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID31428704
PMCPMC6683110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.