Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31428565›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2019

Comparative toxicity evaluation of graphene oxide (GO) and zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles on

Kritika Sood, Jasreen Kaur, Harpreet Singh, Shailendra Kumar Arya, Madhu Khatri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Motor dysfunction iniScience · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Toxicity of Dithiothreitol (DTT) toToxicology reports · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kritika SoodDepartment of Biotechnology Engineering, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India.
Jasreen KaurCenter for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India.
Harpreet SinghDepartment of Biotechnology Engineering, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India.
Shailendra Kumar AryaDepartment of Biotechnology Engineering, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India.
Madhu KhatriDepartment of Biotechnology Engineering, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India.
Panjab University · INWellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineered nanomaterials consisting of multiple nanoparticles (NPs) are finding their use in fields as wide and diverse as medicine, environment, cosmetics, energy and electronics. However, health and environmental impacts of these NPs need to be discerned individually to understand their true toxicity. Due to the promising application of upcoming material like GO-ZnO nanocomposite, the toxicity of ZnO and GO NPs was evaluated and compared individually in our study. This study compares the toxicity of Graphene Oxide (GO) NPs and Zinc Oxide (ZnO) NPs synthesized by Green method and Chemical method on

Indexed as

DrosophilaGraphene oxideNanoparticlesNanotoxicityZinc oxide

Identifiers

PMID31428565
PMCPMC6695280
OpenAlexW2965376207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.