Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31428533›Full record

ArticleJournal of health disparities research and practice2018

Promoting Community and Population Health in Public Health and Medicine: A Stepwise Guide to Initiating and Conducting Community-engaged Research.

Scott D Rhodes, Amanda E Tanner, Lilli Mann-Jackson, Jorge Alonzo, Florence M Simán, Eunyoung Y Song, Jonathan Bell, Megan B Irby, Aaron T Vissman, Robert E Aronson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health disparities research and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Proposal for Addressing Bioethical Concerns Along the 10-Step Framework for Community Engagement.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. UsingProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Scott D RhodesWake Forest School of Medicine.
Amanda E TannerUniversity of North Carolina Greensboro.
Lilli Mann-JacksonWake Forest School of Medicine.
Jorge AlonzoWake Forest School of Medicine.
Florence M SimánEl Pueblo.
Eunyoung Y SongWake Forest School of Medicine.
Jonathan BellWake Forest School of Medicine.
Megan B IrbyWake Forest School of Medicine.
Aaron T VissmanTalbert House.
Robert E AronsonTaylor University.

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
Reducing HIV Disparities among Latinos: Disseminating An Effective InterventionR24MD002774 · NIMHD · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RHODES, SCOTT D · 2008 to 2015
$3.6M
Using CBPR to Reduce HIV Risk Among Immigrant Latino MSMR01MH087339 · NIMH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RHODES, SCOTT D · 2010 to 2014
$2.2M
HIV prevention among Latina transgender women who have sex with men: Evaluation of a locally developed interventionU01PS005137 · PS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RHODES, SCOTT D · 2016 to 2019
$2.0M
PS09-007, Evaluating Locally-Developed Homegrown HIV Prevention InterventionsU01PS001570 · PS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RHODES, SCOTT D · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
Evaluating an intervention to increase HIV testing through chat room promotionR01MH092932 · NIMH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RHODES, SCOTT D · 2011 to 2014
$1.4M
Targeted PrEP Implementation: Interrupting HIV Transmission Among Young Black MSMU01PS005115 · PS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FIELDS, ERROL L · 2016 to 2019
$1.4M
HIV/AIDS Prevention with African American heterosexual men attending college: A UR6PS000690 · PS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO · PI ARONSON, ROBERT E · 2007 to 2010
$853k
Trabajando Juntos: Working for Health Disparity Reduction among LatinosR21MH079827 · NIMH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RHODES, SCOTT D · 2007 to 2008
$366k
CBPR and the Internet: Increasing HIV Testing Through Chat Room-Based PromotionR21MH082689 · NIMH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RHODES, SCOTT D · 2008 to 2009
$345k
ACL HHS U01PS005115ACL HHS U01PS005137NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420NCHHSTP CDC HHS U01 PS001570NCHHSTP CDC HHS U01 PS005115NCHHSTP CDC HHS U01 PS005137NCHHSTP CDC HHS UR6 PS000690NIMHD NIH HHS R24 MD002774NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087339NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH092932NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH079827NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH082689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various methods, approaches, and strategies designed to understand and reduce health disparities, increase health equity, and promote community and population health have emerged within public health and medicine. One such approach is community-engaged research. While the literature describing the theory, principles, and rationale underlying community engagement is broad, few models or frameworks exist to guide its implementation. We abstracted, analyzed, and interpreted data from existing project documentation including proposal documents, project-specific logic models, research team and partnership meeting notes, and other materials from 24 funded community-engaged research projects conducted over the past 17 years. We developed a 15-step process designed to guide the community-engaged research process. The process includes steps such as: networking and partnership establishment and expansion; building and maintaining trust; identifying health priorities; conducting background research, prioritizing "what to take on"; building consensus, identifying research goals, and developing research questions; developing a conceptual model; formulating a study design; developing an analysis plan; implementing the study; collecting and analyzing data; reviewing and interpreting results; and disseminating and translating findings broadly through multiple channels. Here, we outline and describe each of these steps.

Indexed as

community-engaged researchdisparitiesequitypartnershipprocess

Identifiers

PMID31428533
PMCPMC6699784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.