Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31428442›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2019

An electronic registry to improve adherence to active surveillance monitoring among men with prostate cancer at a safety-net hospital: protocol for a pilot study.

Benjamin Cedars, Sarah Lisker, Hala T Borno, Puneet Kamal, Benjamin Breyer, Urmimala Sarkar

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03553732 (An Electronic Registry to Improve Adherence to Active Surveillance Monitoring Among Men With Prostate Cancer at a Safety-net Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03553732 terminatednot on this map

An Electronic Registry to Improve Adherence to Active Surveillance Monitoring Among Men With Prostate Cancer at a Safety-net Hospital: A Study Protocol

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2018 to 2019Enrolled48ConditionsProstatic NeoplasmsArmsRegistry
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin Cedars1Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92103 USA.
Sarah Lisker2Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, 2789 25th Street, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA.
Hala T Borno3Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA.
Puneet Kamal4Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA.
Benjamin Breyer4Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA.
Urmimala Sarkar2Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, 2789 25th Street, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4213-4405

Funding

Improving Survivorship Care for Diverse Cancer Patients Cared for in Safety-net SettingsK24CA212294 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SARKAR, URMIMALA · 2017 to 2021
$831k
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA212294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evidence-based practice of active surveillance to monitor men with favorable-risk prostate cancer in lieu of initial definitive treatment is becoming more common. However, there are barriers to effective implementation, particularly in low-resource settings. Our goal is to assess the efficacy and feasibility of a health information technology registry for men on active surveillance at a safety-net hospital to ensure patients receive guideline-recommended care.

methodsWe developed an electronic registry for urology clinic staff to monitor men on active surveillance. The health information technology tool was developed using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model and iteratively tailored to the needs of the clinic by engaging providers in a co-design process. We will enroll all men at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center who choose active surveillance as a treatment strategy. The primary outcomes to be assessed during this non-randomized, pragmatic evaluation are number of days delayed beyond recommended date of follow-up testing, the proportion of men who are lost to follow-up, the cancer stage at active treatment, and the feasibility and acceptability of the clinic-wide intervention with clinic staff. Secondary outcomes include appointment adherence within 30 days of the scheduled date. DISCUSSION: Use of a customized electronic approach for monitoring men on active surveillance could improve patient outcomes. It may help reduce the number of men lost to follow-up and improve adherence to timely follow-up testing. Evaluating the adoption and efficacy of a customized registry in a safety-net setting may also demonstrate feasibility for implementation in diverse clinical contexts.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03553732, An Electronic Registry to Improve Adherence to Active Surveillance Monitoring at a Safety-net Hospital. Registered 11 June 2018.

Indexed as

Active surveillanceHealth information technology (HIT)Patient safetyProstate cancerSafety netSystems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS)

Identifiers

PMID31428442
PMCPMC6694525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.