Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31428299›Full record

ArticleEvoDevo2019

Conserved gene signalling and a derived patterning mechanism underlie the development of avian footpad scales.

Rory L Cooper, Victoria J Lloyd, Nicolas Di-Poï, Alexander G Fletcher, Paul M Barrett, Gareth J Fraser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EvoDevo, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Hydrocortisone treatment as a tool to study conjunctival placode induction.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evo Devo of the Vertebrates Integument.Journal of developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Convergent developmental patterns underlie the repeated evolution of adhesive toe pads among lizards.Biological journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rory L Cooper *1Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Victoria J Lloyd *1Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Nicolas Di-Poï2Program in Developmental Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Alexander G Fletcher3School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Paul M Barrett4Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.
Gareth J Fraser1Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7376-0962
University of Sheffield · GBNatural History Museum · GBUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVertebrates possess a diverse range of integumentary epithelial appendages, including scales, feathers and hair. These structures share extensive early developmental homology, as they mostly originate from a conserved anatomical placode. In the context of avian epithelial appendages, feathers and scutate scales are known to develop from an anatomical placode. However, our understanding of avian reticulate (footpad) scale development remains unclear.

resultsHere, we demonstrate that reticulate scales develop from restricted circular domains of thickened epithelium, with localised conserved gene expression in both the epithelium and underlying mesenchyme. These domains constitute either anatomical placodes, or circular initiatory fields (comparable to the avian feather tract). Subsequent patterning of reticulate scales is consistent with reaction-diffusion (RD) simulation, whereby this primary domain subdivides into smaller secondary units, which produce individual scales. In contrast, the footpad scales of a squamate model (the bearded dragon,

conclusionsWidely conserved gene signalling underlies the initial development of avian reticulate scales. However, their subsequent patterning is distinct from the footpad scale patterning of a squamate model, and the feather and scutate scale patterning of birds. Therefore, we suggest reticulate scales are a comparatively derived epithelial appendage, patterned through a modified RD system.

Indexed as

ChickenEpithelial appendagePatterningPlacodeReaction–diffusionReticulate scale

Identifiers

PMID31428299
PMCPMC6693258
OpenAlexW2967280324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.