ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2019
Shared Decision-Making Training in Internal Medicine: A Multisite Intervention Study.
Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Brief Web-Based Person-Centered Care Group Training Program for the Management of Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial in Spain.JMIR medical education · 2025Trial
- Resident Proficiency in Assessing Medical Decision-Making Capacity: A Needs Assessment and Educational Intervention.Cureus · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of the SHARE Approach for Improving Clinician Shared Decision Making Skills: A Trial in 12 Practices Located in Colorado, USA.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Shared Decision Making in Acute Pain Management in Patients with Opioid Use Disorder: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Determining the Development Strategy and Suited Adoption Paths for the Core Competence of Shared Decision-Making Tasks through the SAA-NRM Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Establishing the Competency Development and Talent Cultivation Strategies for Physician-Patient Shared Decision-Making Competency Based on the IAA-NRM Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Links between evidence-based medicine and shared decision-making in courses for doctors in training: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2022Article
- The Value of International Research and Learning in Graduate Medical Education.Journal of graduate medical education · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearch shows that when patients and health care providers share responsibility for clinical decisions, both patient satisfaction and quality of care increase, and resource use decreases. Yet few studies have assessed how to train residents to use shared decision-making (SDM) in their practice.
objectiveWe developed and evaluated a SDM training program in internal medicine.
methodsSenior internal medicine residents from 3 hospitals in Switzerland were assessed shortly before and 2 months after completing a program that included a 2-hour workshop and pocket card use in clinical practice. Encounters with standardized patients (SPs) were recorded and SDM performance was assessed using a SDM completeness rating scale (scores ranging from 0 to 100), a self-reported questionnaire, and SPs rating the residents.
resultsOf 39 eligible residents, 27 (69%) participated. The mean (SD) score improved from 65 (SD 13) to 71 (SD 12; effect size [ES] 0.53;
conclusionsThe SDM training program improved the competencies of internal medicine residents and promoted the use of SDM in clinical practice. The approach may be of interest for teaching SDM to residents in other disciplines and to medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.