Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31428269›Full record

ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2019

Contrasting Residency Training in Japan and the United States From Perspectives of Japanese Physicians Trained in Both Systems.

Brian S Heist, Haruka Matsubara Torok

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian S Heist
Haruka Matsubara Torok

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternational medical graduates (IMGs) have significant exposure to clinical training in their home country, which provides opportunity for international comparison of training experiences. One relevant IMG population is Japanese physicians who have completed some training before entering residency programs in the United States and desire to improve medical education in Japan.

objectiveWe examined Japanese IMGs' perceptions of the respective attributes of residency in the United States and Japan.

methodsIndividual semistructured interviews were conducted with 33 purposively sampled Japanese IMGs who had completed training. We used exploratory thematic analysis, iterative data collection, and thematic analyses with constant comparison.

resultsComments were organized into 3 categories: (1) attributes of US residency preferable to Japanese residency; (2) attributes of residency training with no clear preference for the US or Japanese systems; and (3) attributes of Japanese residency preferable to US residency. Within each category, we matched themes to residency program requirements or culture of medical training. Main themes include high regard for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Common Program Requirements, with emphasis on efficient achievement of clinical competency through graded responsibility, contrasted with preference expressed for a Japanese training culture of increased professional commitment facilitated by a lack of work hour limits and development of broad clinician skills, including bedside procedures and radiology interpretation.

conclusionsJapanese training culture contrasts with a US model that is increasingly focused on work-life balance and associated compartmentalization of patient care. These findings enhance our understanding of the global medical education landscape and challenges to international standardization of training.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyEducation, Medical, GraduateForeign Medical GraduatesHumansJapanUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31428269
PMCPMC6697274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.