Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31428127›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019

Comparative Cytogenetics and Neo-Y Formation in Small-Sized Fish Species of the Genus Pyrrhulina (Characiformes, Lebiasinidae).

Renata Luiza Rosa de Moraes, Alexandr Sember, Luiz Antônio Carlos Bertollo, Ezequiel Aguiar de Oliveira, Petr Ráb, Terumi Hatanaka, Manoela Maria Ferreira Marinho, Thomas Liehr, Ahmed B H Al-Rikabi, Eliana Feldberg and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Genetic Differentiation ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  16. Against the mainstream: exceptional evolutionary stability of ZW sex chromosomes across the fish families Triportheidae and Gasteropelecidae (Teleostei: Characiformes).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2021
    Article
  17. Multiple sex chromosomes in teleost fishes from a cytogenetic perspective: state of the art and future challenges.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Comparative study of fourComparative cytogenetics · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Renata Luiza Rosa de MoraesLaboratório de Citogenética de Peixes, Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil.
Alexandr SemberLaboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Liběchov, Czechia.
Luiz Antônio Carlos BertolloLaboratório de Citogenética de Peixes, Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil.
Ezequiel Aguiar de OliveiraLaboratório de Citogenética de Peixes, Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil.
Petr RábLaboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Liběchov, Czechia.
Terumi HatanakaLaboratório de Citogenética de Peixes, Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil.
Manoela Maria Ferreira MarinhoMuseu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, (MZUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Thomas LiehrInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Ahmed B H Al-RikabiInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Eliana FeldbergLaboratório de Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coordenação de Biodiversidade, Manaus, Brazil.
Patrik F VianaLaboratório de Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coordenação de Biodiversidade, Manaus, Brazil.
Marcelo de Bello CioffiLaboratório de Citogenética de Peixes, Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil.
Jena University Hospital · DEUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BRCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics · CZNational Institute of Amazonian Research · BRSecretaria da Educação · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although fishes have traditionally been the subject of comparative evolutionary studies, few reports have concentrated on the application of multipronged modern molecular cytogenetic techniques (such as comparative genomic hybridization = CGH and whole chromosome painting = WCP) to analyze deeper the karyotype evolution of specific groups, especially the historically neglected small-sized ones. Representatives of the family Lebiasinidae (Characiformes) are a notable example, where only a few cytogenetic investigations have been conducted thus far. Here, we aim to elucidate the evolutionary processes behind the karyotype differentiation of

Indexed as

chromosomal paintingcomparative genomic hybridization (CGH)fisheskaryotype evolutionmolecular cytogeneticssex chromosome

Identifiers

PMID31428127
PMCPMC6689988
OpenAlexW2966668109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.