Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31427890›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2019

Gynecological cancer inpatients need more supportive nursing care than outpatients: a comparative study.

Tina Mawardika, Yati Afiyanti, Hayuni Rahmah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Effect of Art Therapy in Women with Gynecologic Cancer: A Systematic Review.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tina MawardikaDepartment of Maternity Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, FIK UI Campus, Jl. Prof. Dr. Bahder Djohan, Depok, West Java 16424 Indonesia.
Yati AfiyantiDepartment of Maternity Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, FIK UI Campus, Jl. Prof. Dr. Bahder Djohan, Depok, West Java 16424 Indonesia.
Hayuni RahmahDepartment of Maternity Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, FIK UI Campus, Jl. Prof. Dr. Bahder Djohan, Depok, West Java 16424 Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGynecological cancer inpatients and outpatients may have distinct supportive nursing care needs. This study aimed to compare the supportive care needs between these two patient cohorts.

methodsThis cross-sectional comparison analytic study aimed to identify the differences between the supportive nursing care needs of the gynecological cancer inpatients and outpatients. Data were collected from 200 participants who were recruited through consecutive sampling method.

resultsThe results showed that gynecological cancer inpatients needed more supportive nursing care than the outpatients. The most reported supportive nursing care needs of the inpatients were in the domains of physical (80%) and the psychological (84%). Whilst, the outpatients needed more health information support (78%). There was a significant difference between the supportive nursing care needs of gynecological cancer inpatients and outpatients (

conclusionsThe gynecological cancer inpatients and outpatients need supportive nursing care differently. Therefore, nurses should assess supportive care needs of their patients early during the care in each setting so that the intervention could be tailored to the patient's individual needs. Our study findings can help nurses navigate the supportive care needs for gynecological cancer patients receiving inpatient and outpatient care.

Indexed as

Gynecological cancerInpatientSupportive nursing care needs

Identifiers

PMID31427890
PMCPMC6696661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.